By Region,By Region,North America,Projects - December 20, 2008

Nevada Geothermal and Pumpernickel project

written by: lxrichter

Nevada Geothermal Power, company logo
After Sierra Geothermal Power Inc. (Sierra) didn´t choose to exercise the option of earning a 50 percent stake in the Nevada Geothermal Power Inc.s (NGP) Pumpernickel project in Nevada, the company announced that it terminated the option agreement with Sierra.

After Sierra Geothermal Power Inc. (Sierra) didn´t choose to exercise the option of earning a 50 percent stake in the Nevada Geothermal Power Inc.s (NGP) Pumpernickel project in Nevada, the company announced that it terminated the option agreement with Sierra.

Brian Fairbank, President and CEO of NGP, stated, “With the value of geothermal projects having increased in value dramatically over the past few years, we are pleased to retain 100% interest in the Pumpernickel project. Significant exploration has been completed at Pumpernickel from 2003 to 2008. NGP will prepare to drill an initial development test well as a next step. NGP will announce further plans for the Pumpernickel project in 2009.”

Source: Company statement

This entry was posted on Saturday, December 20th, 2008 at 8:32 pm and is filed under By Region, North America, Projects. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Post a comment

Subscribe to comment
You should
Follow us

THINK GEOTHERMAL

Geothermal
Tweets on twitter

Geothermal
Pictures on flickr

    • Carbon Recycling International Opening 2012
    • Carbon Recycling International Opening 2012
    • Carbon Recycling International Opening 2012
    • Carbon Recycling International Opening 2012
    • Carbon Recycling International Opening 2012
    • Carbon Recycling International Opening 2012

Geothermal
videos on youtube

  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Geothermal
is on NIng

Geothermal Network on Ning ThinkGeoEnergy created a geothermal social community network on Ning. It is aimed at facilitating some of the discussions and exchange that ThinkGeoEnergy cannot cover on the website.

Archives