<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Think GeoEnergy - Geothermal Energy News &#187; North America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/category/byregion/northamerica/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com</link>
	<description>ThinkGeoEnergy is the leading geothermal energy news website, with news from the global geothermal power and large scale direct use industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>University spin-off plans on using CO2 for the extraction of geothermal heat</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11207</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11207#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat Mining Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Minnesota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heat Mining Company, a spinoff by the University of Minnesota expects to be using sequestered CO2 instead of water to extract geothermal heat from geothermal wells.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A spinoff by the University of Minnesota in the U.S. expects to be using sequestered CO2 instead of water to extract geothermal heat from geothermal wells.</p>
<p>Heat Mining Company LLC, said in a written statement that the use of sequestered carbon dioxide will allow electricity to be provided from many more sites than would be possible with conventional water-based systems and does it more economically.</p>
<p>“CO2 Plume Geothermal technology makes production of power using geothermal heat financially feasible, where water isn’t,” said Ken Carpenter, Managing Partner of South Dakota-based Heat startup.</p>
<p>“This technology sits at the convergence of two conflicting demands in our society: the need to burn fossil fuels for the foreseeable future and the desire to reduce carbon emissions,” Carpenter said.</p>
<p>CO2 Plume GeothermalTM (CPGTM) technology is an attractive solution for conventional fossil-fueled power plants, as it prevents emitted CO2, an environmental liability in the atmosphere, from being released to the air and uses it instead as the underground working fluid to extract geothermal heat for additional electricity production and/or district heating.</p>
<p>In the process, the CO2 is permanently stored underground, resulting in a geothermal power plant with not only a neutral, but even a negative carbon footprint. The geothermal power facility can produce base-load power or provide peak-load power and thus also serve as a type of high-efficiency back-up “battery” for only intermittently available wind or solar power.</p>
<p>“This technology has the potential to introduce a new era of electrical power production from renewable wind, solar, and geothermal energy as well as from traditional fossil fuels, while significantly reducing emissions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere,” said Martin Saar, co-inventor and earth sciences professor in the university&#8217;s College of Science and Engineering.</p>
<p>The University of Minnesota submitted the technology for patents in March 2009 and licensed it exclusively, worldwide to Heat Mining Company LLC through the Office for Technology Commercialization. The approach was invented by Saar, Postdoctoral Fellow Jimmy Randolph, and Mechanical Engineering Professor Thomas Kuehn.</p>
<p>Carbon capture and geologic CO2 sequestration is a fairly new solution for preventing CO2 emissions at fossil-fueled power plants. A typical coal-burning power plant produces between 3.5 and 5 million tons of CO2 per year, and it’s possible to retrofit existing plants, and design new plants, that capture the CO2 and sequester it underground.</p>
<p>With a CPGTM system tapping into the underground CO2 and using it as a heat extraction fluid, power produced from earth&#8217;s underground heat can be used for CO2 injection pumps while revenue from additional geothermal electricity sales can offset the very high costs of capturing the CO2 in the fossil-fueled power plant.</p>
<p>In addition to producing renewable energy and preventing emissions, CPG could someday provide large scale storage of solar and wind energy. The technology could also supply power for enhanced oil recovery projects that produce oil from fields that have nearly reached the end of their productive lives.</p>
<p>The CPG method has been demonstrated in computer simulations and details have been investigated in laboratory experiments. The next step is to build a pilot plant to test it in the field.</p>
<p>Saar&#8217;s research leading to the new technology was originally funded by the Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment (IREE), a signature program of the University of Minnesota’s Institute on the Environment (IonE).</p>
<p>The initial research resulted in a significant federal grant from the U.S. Department of Energy as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www1.umn.edu/news/news-releases/2012/UR_CONTENT_382849.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www1.umn.edu/news/news-releases/2012/UR_CONTENT_382849.html?referer=');">University of Minnesota</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11207/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Overview_CO2_geothermal_SaarRandolph-300x232.png" length="73939" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abandoned coal mines as source for geothermal direct use for heating</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11205</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study by researchers of McGill University in Montreal, Canada, might help predict how much energy can be utilized for heating collecting heat in abandoned mines, estimating that per kilometer of mine shafts heat of 150 kW could be produced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported by several media outlets earlier this month and in the past, old coal mines have a potential to be used for the utilization of geothermal heat for heating above the surface. There are projects and actual existing installations, e.g. in Springhill, Nova Scotia and planned project at Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories both in Canada.</p>
<p>There have also been efforts by mining groups to evaluate revenue creation from abandoned mines. Now there is a &#8220;new study that might help predict how much energy could be harnessed from the heat collecting in abandoned mines.</p>
<p>Researchers from McGill University in Montreal stated using this kind of geothermal energy may possibly advantage as much as one million people in Canada and have even far better prospective for alot more densely populated countries such as Britain. By analysing the heat flow by means of mine tunnels flooded with water, the group has created a model that could be utilized to assess the thermal behaviour of a mine under distinct heat-extraction scenarios.</p>
<p>In a paper due to be published in the American Institute of Physics’ Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, the researchers calculate that each kilometre of a widespread deep underground mine could produce 150kW of heat.</p>
<p>As with other geothermal plants, hot mine water is often pumped towards the surface, the heat extracted as well as the cool water returned to the ground. But for this to be sustainable, the heat need to not be removed a lot more easily than it might be replenished by the surrounding rock.&#8221;</p>
<p>This could mean a big step ahead the utilization of abandoned mines.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://sustainableenergysystemz.com/geothermal-energy-potential-from-abandoned-mines-revealed-by-researchers/672/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/sustainableenergysystemz.com/geothermal-energy-potential-from-abandoned-mines-revealed-by-researchers/672/?referer=');">Sustainable Energy Systemz </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11205/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Yellowknife_ConMine_NWT_Canada-300x223.jpg" length="27536" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ram Power announces record financial results for Q1 2012.</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11193</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11193#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geyser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jacinto-Tizate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geothermal developer Ram Power Corp. announces a major improvement in the financial performance of the company in its financial results released for the first quarter of 2012. With $6.3 million in revenue and an EBITDA of $2.7 million, the company clearly improves its position for further growth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release by the company, &#8220;Ram Power, Corp. announces its operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2012.</p>
<p>The achievement of commercial operation of the Phase I expansion at San Jacinto led to a major improvement in the financial performance of the Company. With $6.3 million in revenue and $2.7 million of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (&#8220;EBITDA&#8221;) for the quarter, the Company took a major step toward generating the levels of cash flow necessary to be able to allocate resources to pipeline projects including Casita and the Geysers. In addition, cost controls implemented in the second half of 2011 have contributed to the increased level of profitability.</p>
<p>Additional highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2012 include:</p>
<ul>
<li>In January, the Phase I expansion at San Jacinto was placed into commercial operation;</li>
<li>Total revenue for the three months was $6.3 million, up $5.3 million from the prior year quarter;</li>
<li>EBITDA for the three months was $2.7 million, up $8.3 million from the prior year quarter;</li>
<li>General and administrative expenses for the three months decreased $3.2 million, or 53%, from the prior year quarter; and</li>
<li>The Company entered into a letter of intent with SNC-Lavalin for the construction of the Geysers Project.</li>
</ul>
<p>For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reported revenue of $6.3 million and a net loss of $2.4 million ($0.01 per share) versus revenue of $1 million and a net loss of $5.8 million ($0.04 per share) for the same period of the prior year. Increased revenue resulted from the San Jacinto-Tizate Phase I expansion being placed in service in January 2012.</p>
<p>EBITDA increased to $2.7 million for the current quarter versus negative EBITDA of $5.6 million in the prior year&#8217;s comparable period. The $8.3 million increase in EBITDA resulted from a $5.1 million increase in gross profit from San Jacinto operations, and a $3.2 million decrease in general and administrative expenses. Although EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure, the Company believes that many of its financial readers find it to be a useful in assessing the Company&#8217;s performance.</p>
<p>For the current period, the Company used $3.8 million for operating activities and $20.7 million for additions to geothermal properties and capital assets, including $20 million for the Phase I and II San Jacinto-Tizate expansion and $0.7 million for other exploration and development projects, with $21 million provided by the San Jacinto Phase II credit facility. At March 31, 2012, the Company had free cash of approximately $53.6 million, of which $40.9 million was held for use in the San Jacinto project.</p>
<p>Concurrent with today&#8217;s release, Shuman Moore, President and CEO of Ram Power, stated, &#8220;We are proud of the consistent operational results to date of our 36 MW net Phase I expansion of San Jacinto-Tizate, which commenced commercial operations this past January. Equally important, the Company continues to develop the San Jacinto-Tizate Phase II, 36 MW net expansion on time and on budget which when completed by year-end will provide another significant increase to revenue and EBITDA for fiscal year 2013. In addition, I am very pleased with the progress we have made with the Geysers project, and we are looking forward to finalizing the EPC contract for this project with SNC-Lavalin in the near term.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: Company release via <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ram-power-announces-record-first-quarter-2012-results-2012-05-15" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/ram-power-announces-record-first-quarter-2012-results-2012-05-15?referer=');">Marketwatch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11193/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/SanJacinto-Tizate_Nicaragua_RamPower-300x225.jpg" length="24424" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EnergySource to unveal $400 m plant in dedication ceremony May 18, 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11186</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11186#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceremony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnergySource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hudson Ranch I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salton Sea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EnergySource to hold dedication ceremony for its Hudson Ranch I geothermal power plant at the Salton Sea, Imperial Valley, California on May 18, 2012. With more than 300 guests expected the event will feature Dennis V. McGinn, president of ACORE as a keynote speaker.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A milestone geothermal project is celebrating its success in a dedication ceremony on May 18, 2012.</p>
<p>EnergySource is holding a ceremony at its Hudson Ranch I geothermal power plant, the first stand-alone geothermal power plant at the Salton Sea resource in more than 20 years. The project represents a number of interesting milestones and facts that are interesting to mention. A rather unique and novice drilling finance by Icelandic bank Glitnir (now Islandsbanki), a successful multi-bank financing round for construction, cornerstone equity investment by GeoGlobal Energy (of New Zealand&#8217;s Mighty River Power), follow-up financing for Hudson Ranch II by turbine producer Fuji Electric and the exciting project to derive Lithium from the brine of the plant by Simbol Materials.</p>
<p>With more than 300 people expected to attend the event, it will see local, national and international guests attending.</p>
<p>Retired Vice Adm. Dennis V. McGinn, president of the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) will present the keynote address during the dedication ceremony.</p>
<p>“EnergySource is pleased to have Admiral McGinn’s participation at our commissioning celebration,” says Dave Watson, president and CEO of EnergySource. “As president of ACORE, he is a strong advocate for innovative government policy, public and private partnerships, and investments that promote clean energy growth and innovation. EnergySource supports his efforts which will help us, and companies like ours, deliver renewable power to utilities in their efforts to procure clean energy and rely less on fossil fuels.”</p>
<p>Additional event speakers are to include Michael Picker, senior advisor to Gov. Jerry Brown for renewable energy; Gary Wyatt, County of Imperial; John Pierre Menvielle, Imperial Irrigation District; Dave Watson, president and CEO, EnergySource; Juan Vargas, senator, 40th district; V. Manuel Perez, assembly member, 80th district.</p>
<p>EnergySource began construction of the $400 million Hudson Ranch I geothermal power plant in May 2010 and created more than 200 jobs during construction. Now in operation, the plant provides 55 full-time jobs in Imperial County. Today the plant is selling all of its energy, capacity and environmental attributes to Salt River Project, a public power utility and water provider serving the greater Phoenix metropolitan area, for a term of 30 years.</p>
<p>Hudson Ranch I and a second plant, Hudson Ranch II, will each generate enough power to serve 50,000 homes in the Southwestern region. <a href="http://www.energysource.us.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.energysource.us.com/?referer=');">EnergySource</a> plans to commence drilling for Hudson Ranch II in the third quarter of this year and construction is scheduled for 2013.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: Release by EnergySource</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11186/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/HudsonRanchI_March-2012-300x198.jpg" length="18436" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Scientific Drillings new Global Marketing Director Jayme Sperring</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11175</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directional drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jayme Sperring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Drilling International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newly appointed global marketing and sales director for Scientific Drilling International, Jayme Sperring, provided an insight into how the company is position itself for growth in the global geothermal energy market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientific Drilling International announced in April that it has named Jayme Sperring its new Director for Global Sales and Marketing. Based out of the company&#8217;s headquarter in Houston, Texas he will manage the company&#8217;s global directional drilling and production logging sales team and marketing department.</p>
<p>Sperring joins Scientific Drilling from National Oilwell Varco (NOV), a manufacturer of drilling, fishing and completion downhole technology serving the upstream oil and gas industry. Sperring joined the organization in 2005 and has held various leadership positions within the downhole division of NOV since 2007.</p>
<p>The main focus of Scientific Drilling clearly is on the oil and gas business, but SDI has also worked and serviced the geothermal sector, so in congratulating Jayme Sperring to his new position, I thought it would be interesting to ask him a few questions on the geothermal ambitions going forward.</p>
<p><strong>How important do you believe will be the geothermal energy market for SDI going forward?  </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>We see the geothermal industry growing from 11GW to roughly 18 GW within the next six years. This growth will require rampant increased drilling activity which will drive demand for specialty drilling services such as directional and production logging. This demand expansion is very important to our diversified energy portfolio and in effort to avoid playing victim to the cyclical nature of the O&amp;G market, Geothermal serves as a strategic element to our long term stability.  Scientific Drilling has been involved in the geothermal industry for over 30 years. We recognize the importance of clean, base-load, renewable power and want to support the growth of the industry in any way possible.</p>
<p><strong>For any industrial development, environmental impact is a key topic of concern, so directional drilling is seen as a way of solving some of those concerns. E.g. in Japan, where the government mentions that directional drilling could allow geothermal development in or close to the national parks.</strong></p>
<p>Directional drilling not only benefits the customer by reaching oil, gas, or geothermal reservoirs with limited surface areas, but it minimizes environmental degradation.  Japan has a unique situation where estimates state 80% of the undeveloped geothermal resource is within national park boundaries. Utilizing directional drilling expertise, Japan will enable well construction on the outskirts of their national parks, minimizing drilling pad surface locations while maximizing the capture of the geothermal resource.</p>
<p><strong>What do you see as key markets for Scientific Drilling in its geothermal activities? </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Scientific Drilling recognizes Latin America, Asia Pacific, East Africa and Continental Europe as our key markets for incremental growth in geothermal (specifically Chile, Peru, Indonesia, Philippines, Kenya and Turkey). We are aggressively establishing ourselves in Latin America through joint venture allinaces and are expanding our business development efforts in Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa as we speak.</p>
<p><strong>There is a strong competition among other oil drilling and service firms. Where do you see the strengths of Scientific Drilling in particular for serving the geothermal market?  </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Scientific Drilling has traditionally differentiated itself by its innovative technology, specifically our gyroscopic technology which is the most accurate and durable in the industry. However, we recognize the rapid commoditization of product offerings and the growing challenge of technology differentiation.  That said, Scientific Drilling will be recognized for a customer experience that makes it easy to do business, delivering customer service and solutions to our customer’s drilling challenges. As an agile, independently operated service company, Scientific Drilling is able to capitalize on this quickly and separate from the competition.</p>
<p>I would like to thank Jayme for taking the time and wish him all the best in his new position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11175/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/SDI_Workshop_PasoRobles2011-300x200.jpg" length="22822" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current U.S. geothermal rig count not promising for further growth</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11170</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11170#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal drilling rig count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rig count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkGeoEnergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With currently only four drilling rigs active on geothermal projects in the U.S., this doesn´t provide a rosy picture for further geothermal growth in the U.S., despite the large number of projects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the release of the latest Annual Power Production and Development Report by the U.S. Geothermal Energy Association in April this year, there are increasing voices over concerns as they relate to the growth of the U.S. geothermal market.</p>
<p>Geothermal project development takes comparably longer than other renewable energy projects, which has been for years a concern. So uncertainties about government support and incentives schemes, but also lack in financing for projects are resulting in time delayed development and plants coming online.</p>
<p>While the industry has seen an increasing interest and growth in recent years, the lack of drilling finance for the last few years is resulting in rather slow growth in the U.S. So there are concerns that with the ever decreasing government support in the U.S. as laid out in a recent article by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (<a href="https://financere.nrel.gov/finance/content/us-geothermal-market-installed-capacity-innovative-technologies-co-production-enhanced-systems" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/financere.nrel.gov/finance/content/us-geothermal-market-installed-capacity-innovative-technologies-co-production-enhanced-systems?referer=');">see article</a>) that growth might stagnate or simply not happen.</p>
<p>So while there are a large number of projects in development with a potential of adding up to 4,900 MW to the grid in the U.S., the current number of drilling rigs drilling on geothermal projects in the U.S. today is rather devastating for any outlook made at the moment.</p>
<p>Currently the rig count is the lowest in the last five years, with currently only four drilling rigs drilling active on geothermal projects in the U.S.</p>
<p>In its monthly oil &amp; gas drilling rig count, Baker Hughes provides an update on drilling rigs active in the North American and international markets. So while 2008 to 2010 saw some growth and stable number of rigs drilling on geothermal projects, the trend of 2011 and continuing into 2012 continues. It is a downward spiral.</p>
<p>No drilling means also no further growth in MW coming online.</p>
<p>Source: Baker Hughes Drilling Rig Count, ThinkGeoEnergy evaluation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11170/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/TGE_US_GeothermalRigCount_May2012-300x224.png" length="74848" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Challenging times and outlook for IPOs of renewable energy companies</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11139</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11139#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The year of 2012 will be a challenging year for clean technology companies looking at raising money on the public markets through an IPO as they are perceived to be riskier]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent article on Forbes, talks about the continuing challenges for the clean energy technology sector to raise financing on the financial markets through IPOs.</p>
<p>The outlook is described as &#8220;rather bleak&#8221; with three companies recently having had to cancel their plans to go public in the U.S. in April of this year.</p>
<p>According to the article the main reason seem to be that &#8220;Green tech companies tend to dwell in emerging markets, rely on big government support and have yet to show their technologies will gain wide acceptance.  Investing them is riskier.&#8221; &#8230; and &#8220;if the overall stock market is tanking because of broader trends, such as poor job data or lower credit ratings for the U.S. and other countries, then investors will find even fewer reasons to put money in green tech stocks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Given the challenges of listed geothermal companies on the stock markets today, it is quite unlikely that there will be a different story for potential geothermal listings.</p>
<p>To read the article referred to see link below.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/uciliawang/2012/04/27/green-tech-ipos-get-no-love/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.forbes.com/sites/uciliawang/2012/04/27/green-tech-ipos-get-no-love/?referer=');">Forbes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11139/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/NYSE_WallStreet_NewYork-300x225.jpg" length="28725" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TAS Energy starts performance testing at San Emidio plant of U.S. Geothermal</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11137</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11137#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Emidio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAS Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Geothermal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TAS Energy as EPC contractor for the San Emidio geothermal power plant of U.S. Geothermal has started performance tests prior to starting commercial operation expected soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release by the development company, U.S. Geothermal announces that its EPC contractor TAS Energy &#8220;has started performance testing on the new 8.6 net megawatt San Emidio power plant. Performance testing includes guaranteed output, capacity, reliability and continuous operation tests that the plant must pass to achieve both commercial operation under the PPA and substantial completion under the EPC contract.</p>
<p id="">The plant has undergone component commissioning during the past three weeks and has operated at generation levels of up to 9 megawatts net (12 megawatts gross). During commissioning and performance testing, all power generated is sold under the PPA at a rate of $50.00 per megawatt-hour until commercial operation is achieved. Upon acceptance of commercial operation by NV Energy, the power rate will increase to $89.75 per megawatt-hour with a 1% annual escalation.</p>
<p id="">The EPC contractor is providing its services under a fixed price contract that includes financial guarantees for the original completion date and power output of the plant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: Company release via <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-geothermal-announces-new-san-emidio-power-plant-beginning-performance-testing-2012-05-10-93130?reflink=MW_news_stmp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/us-geothermal-announces-new-san-emidio-power-plant-beginning-performance-testing-2012-05-10-93130?reflink=MW_news_stmp&amp;referer=');">Marketwatch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11137/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/SanEmidio_USGeothermal_Feb2012-300x167.png" length="85556" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enel Green Power  to focus on emerging markets in Latin America</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11134</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11134#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Central America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enel Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With planned investments of about $7.9 billion until 2016, Enel Green Power aims at focusing its development efforts on emerging markets in Latin and North America.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In connection with the announcement of Enel Green Power about its $126 million investment into building its Cove Fort geothermal projects in Utah, U.S., the company also provided an insight into its geographical focus.</p>
<p>Given stagnating power demand and the continued unclear regulatory framework in its home markets Italy and Spain, Enel Green Power aims at putting a corporate focus on emerging markets and to &#8220;raise its profile&#8221; in North America.</p>
<p>Enel Green Power is one of the largest geothermal power producers with large renewable energy operations across the world and geothermal energy operations in Italy, North America, Central and South America and Europe.</p>
<p>With its focus on emerging markets in Latin America, it will be interesting to see how fast the company pushes its projects in Chile among other Latin American countries.</p>
<p>As reported by Reuters the company plans to spend about EUR 6 billion ($7.9 billion) worldwide until 2016 to increase its overall power generation capacity by 4,300 MW from 7,100 MW (end of 2011) to 11,400 MW.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL5E8G7DJC20120507" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL5E8G7DJC20120507?referer=');">Reuters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11134/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Lardarello_plant_Italy-300x225.jpg" length="16003" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii geothermal bill could expand geothermal energy production</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11129</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11129#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geothermal legislation has been put in front of Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie. By amending the Hawaii State Planning Act it aims at to encourage development on state and public trust land.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported yesterday, the state legislative in Hawaii has put forward a geothermal energy bill before the governor of Hawaii.</p>
<p>The legislation could expand geothermal energy production across the state by amending the Hawaii State Planning Act to encourage development of geothermal energy projects on state and public trust land.</p>
<p>&#8220;I really believe that the consumer should own the resource because it&#8217;s a mineral,&#8221; explained Sen. Malama Solomon, who introduced Senate Bills 2001 and 3003.</p>
<p>Geothermal energy is seen as a key option for the state to reach its clean energy goal of 70 percent of energy to come from renewable energy by 2030. Currently the state depends on diesel for most of its electricity supply, with only 10 percent coming from renewables.</p>
<div>
<p>&#8220;Solomon also introduced a resolution calling for more transparency from alternative energy companies. If renewable energy plants offered information that met current technological standards, she believes there might not be as much confusion over intermittent and firm alternative energies.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&#8220;This new regulatory responsibility will put Public Utilities Commission in better position to make sound recommendations about what works and what doesn&#8217;t work for Hawaii when it comes to indigenous renewable energy resources,&#8221; she said.&#8221;</p>
<p>State Governor Neil Abercrombie has until the middle of June to decide on the legislation put in front of him. It seems like he only has an option to either veto it or letting it become law with or without his signature.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/05/09/hawaii-geothermal-bills-energy-costs_n_1503183.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/05/09/hawaii-geothermal-bills-energy-costs_n_1503183.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&amp;referer=');">The Huffington Post</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11129/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/PunaGeothermalplant_Hawaii-300x195.jpg" length="22349" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Jeff Bingaman with keynote at international conference in Washington May 23, 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11125</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11125#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Geothermal Showcase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic senator of New Mexico and Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Jeff Bingaman will present the keynote address at the upcoming International Geothermal Energy Showcase in Washington DC on May 23, 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release yesterday, the &#8220;U.S. Geothermal Energy Association (GEA) announced that Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) will present the keynote address at the fourth annual <a href="http://geo-energy.org/events/GEA_ShowCase_05_23_12.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/geo-energy.org/events/GEA_ShowCase_05_23_12.aspx?referer=');">International Geothermal Energy Showcase</a> to be held this month in Washington, D.C. Sen. Bingaman, the Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, is a long-time supporter of the renewable energy sector and recognizes the economic and environmental potential of developing clean technology and green jobs.</p>
<p>Bingaman joins a host of minister-level speakers and geothermal executives who will present at the showcase. Confirmed speakers for the event, to be held on May 23 at the Ronald Reagan Building &amp; International Trade Center in Washington, D.C.,  include Minister Emilio Rappaccioli, Ministry of Energy and Mining, Nicaragua; Dr. Fouad Ahmed Aye, Minister of Energy and Water, Republic of Djibouti; Friedo Sielemann, Counselor, Energy and Environment, German Embassy; Freddy Saragih, Fiscal Policy Board, Ministry of Finance, Indonesia; and Dr. Jerrol Thompson, Prime Minister’s Office St. Vincent &amp; Grenadines. Industry speakers include Shuman Moore, CEO, Ram Power; Halley Dickey, Director Geothermal Business Development, TAS Energy; and John Fox, CEO, Electratherm.</p>
<p>“Senator Bingaman had been a leader in advancing policies to expand renewable energy production as one of the keys to a strong economy and environmentally-fit planet,” said Karl Gawell, Executive Director, GEA. &#8220;We are thrilled that he will share his vision of how government policies can help clean energy technologies grow with the distinguished roster of world and industry leaders attending the International Showcase.”</p>
<p>Hosted by GEA in alliance with the U.S. Trade and Development Agency, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Agency for International Development, U.S. Department of State and the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Showcase will highlight geothermal projects, policies and development from the world’s key geothermal markets including the Caribbean, Latin America, East Africa, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. The program will encourage interaction and discussion about government policies, projects in development, market potential and opportunities for U.S. companies. Attendees will also hear from U.S. government agencies involved in export assistance for geothermal companies, and from U.S. companies developing projects overseas. GEA has confirmed attendance from government and industry leaders representing 23 countries. These countries include Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Djibouti, France, Germany, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nevis, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Pakistan, the Philippines, Romania, Rwanda, St. Vincent &amp; Grenadines, Tanzania, Turkey and the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: GEA release by email</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11125/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Senator_Bingaman_NewMexico_US-300x200.jpg" length="12045" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. federal clean energy funding to fall by more than 50% in 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11110</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11110#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal funding for the clean tech sector is to see a dramatic fall of more than 50% for 2012 and more to come in 2013 and 2014.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the ongoing fear of the expected financial drop in the U.S, given expected tax hikes and spending cuts. For the clean tech and renewable energy sector though the drop could be even harder, so a recent article in the U.S.</p>
<p>Annual federal clean tech expenditure had already seen a drop by $10 billion between 2009 and 2011, now that the Recovery Act is wound down. But not a drop of more than 50% expected this year, there will be another decline in 2013 and 2014.</p>
<p>This essentially is devastating for all the renewable energy sectors that are not competitive with conventional energy resources or are dependent on incentives to help with development, such as for geothermal energy.</p>
<p>There is now talk about that despite the drop there won´t be a &#8220;clean tech crash&#8221;, but it will have to be seen if it will be possible to foster the development of well-designed policies with the upcoming presidential elections in the U.S. this fall and the deadlock between the two houses in Washington.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/save-clean-energy-154546317.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/finance.yahoo.com/news/save-clean-energy-154546317.html?referer=');">Finance Yahoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11110/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/FederalCleanTechSpending2009-2014_US-300x232.png" length="31045" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enel Green Power starts construction of 25 MW Cove Fort plant</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11106</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cove Fort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enel Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enel Green Power has started construction at its 26 MW Cove Fort geothermal power plant in Southern Utah with an expected start of operation by the end of 2013.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported yesterday, the North American subsidiary of Italian listed Enel Green Power has started construction of its planned 25 MW geothermal power plant at Cove Fort in Utah.</p>
<p>It is expected that the plant will start operate by the end of 2013 and will have cost approximately $126 million. The project has secured a 20-year power purchase agreement with local utility.</p>
<p>“We are pleased to begin another major geothermal project in the US, an industry in which EGP is already a strong player in that country, with two innovative systems using binary technology in Nevada, one of which, Stillwater, is also paired with a photovoltaic system, the first of its kind in the world,” said Francesco Starace, CEO of Enel Green Power (EGP). “Cove Fort will contribute its capacity to Enel Green Power’s existing net installed geothermal capacity in the US, currently amounting to 47MW.”</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.enelgreenpower.com/en-GB/ena/events_news/press_releases/release.aspx?iddoc=1651965" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.enelgreenpower.com/en-GB/ena/events_news/press_releases/release.aspx?iddoc=1651965&amp;referer=');">Enel Green Power Release</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11106/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/CoveFort_Utah-300x200.jpg" length="12964" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Ponder joins GRC as interim Executive Director</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11101</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11101#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Resources Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ponder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) announces that Steve Ponder as joined the organization as its interim Executive Director having started his duties May 1, 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release last week, the Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) announced the appointment of Steve Ponder as the association&#8217;s interim Executive Director, who took up his new duties on May 1.</p>
<p>Steve has over 30 years of leadership experience in the renewable energy industry including geothermal development and operations for companies including Unocal, Geothermal Resources International and FPL Energy (FPLE).</p>
<p>He helped develop over 100 MWs of geothermal resources at the Geysers geothermal field in northern California and led FPLE&#8217;s regulatory strategy for their 500 MWs of assets during the California energy crisis in 1999-2000. Most recently he was Director of Renewable Energy at NV Energy. He further served for years as a Board Member of the U.S. Geothermal Energy Association (GEA).</p>
<p>Steve obtained a BA and MA from the University of Southern California and a JD from Southwestern University.</p>
<p>Steve is committed to serving the global geothermal community and developing relationships that will enhance the development of geothermal energy utilization.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: GRC release via <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/5/prweb9470563.htm" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.prweb.com/releases/2012/5/prweb9470563.htm?referer=');">PR Web</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11101/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/StevePonder_GRC_ExecutiveDirector-300x184.jpg" length="17464" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continues capacity decline at Coso of concern for investors</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11099</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coso Geothermal Power Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fitch has downgraded the rating on Coso Geothermal Power Holdings certificates of $523 million outstanding due 2026, following reports on the continuous decline in net capacity from 180 MW in 2010 to today 170 MW.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitch Ratings has announced it has downgraded the rating on Coso Geothermal Power Holdings LLC $629 million ($523 million outstanding) pass through certificates due 2026 from &#8216;B&#8217; to &#8216;CCC&#8217;. The downgrade reflects the continued decline in net capacity of the Coso geothermal resource (Coso) and projected cash flows that will be insufficient to meet debt obligations.</p>
<p>The key driver for the rating downgrade are:</p>
<p>Geothermal Resource Depletion: Coso&#8217;s average net capacity declined over 5% to 170 megawatts (MW) in 2011 from approximately 180MW in 2010. The continued decline in capacity is reducing revenues, and lowering cash flows to levels that are not sufficient to meet debt obligations.</p>
<div id="story_text_remaining">
<p>Expected Payment Shortfall: Fitch&#8217;s expectation for performance at Coso for the calendar year 2012 indicates that cash available for debt service will result in a payment shortfall. This will necessitate a draw on the letter of credit-funded senior rent reserve to meet debt obligations.</p>
<p>Limited Revenue Risk: Price risk on energy revenues is now limited to one-fifth of total revenues from July 2014 &#8211; March 2019. Coso executed an amendment with off-taker Southern California Edison (SCE) to fix the energy price earned at the BLM plant through June 30, 2014.</p>
<p>A trigger action could be trigged:</p>
<p>If the geothermal resource depletion accelerates, revenues and cash flows will shrink more quickly, reducing already below breakeven coverages.</p>
<p>Letter of credit-funded facilities supporting the power purchase agreement collateral posting and debt service reserve are set to expire on Dec. 7, 2012. If not renewed or replaced, the facilities would be drawn in cash, substantially increasing Coso&#8217;s debt obligations.</p>
<p>Each tranche of the certificates represents an undivided interest in a related pass-through trust, which holds the lessor notes (notes) issued by the owner lessors. The notes are the sole collateral and source of repayment of the certificates.</p>
<p>Coso has been unable to reverse a steady decline in geothermal resource output, and is expected to draw from its letter of credit-funded senior rent reserve in order to meet the debt portion of its lease rent obligation beginning in 2012. Absent a significant improvement in net capacity levels, operating cash flow will be insufficient to meet long-term debt obligations.</p>
<p>In developing a base case for long-term expected performance, Fitch applied minimal project and financial stresses, and utilized a sponsor assumption for Coso&#8217;s 2012 net capacity. This scenario indicates a financial profile where default is a real possibility. Fitch expects Coso to operate close to or below breakeven levels on its debt obligations for the remainder of the debt tenor, with a DSCR average of 0.85 times (x) and minimum of 0.70x. Fitch projects that the reserve will be fully depleted by 2017, leading to a default on payment of the CGP certificates. These projections assume that Coso will extend or replace its current credit facilities, which are set to expire on Dec. 7, 2012. If the facilities are not extended or replaced, it is likely that Coso would draw on the existing letters of credit, creating additional debt obligations that would accelerate default.</p>
<div>Source: Fitch release via <a href="http://www.sunherald.com/2012/05/03/3924516/fitch-downgrades-coso-geothermal.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.sunherald.com/2012/05/03/3924516/fitch-downgrades-coso-geothermal.html?referer=');">Sun Herald </a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11099/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/CosoChinaLake_geothermalplant11-300x220.jpg" length="24070" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calpine receives regulator approval for new plants at the Geysers</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11097</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11097#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buckseye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calpine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Geysers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildhorse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calpine receives air quality regulators for the planned geothermal power plants of Wildhorse and Buckseye with a combined capacity of 100 MW in the Geysers area in California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported from the U.S., Calpine has secured permits to build two new geothermal power plants at the Geysers area in California. The permits come from the air quality regulators and are another milestone in this 100 MW $700 million project. The planned plants are known as Wildhorse and Buckeye.</p>
<p>Interesting fact is though that this would set the price at $7 million for 1 MW installed capacity, which seems outrageously high.</p>
<p>Production from the new plants could start as early as 2014 with expected construction duration of about 30 months.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20120507/BUSINESS/120509658/1036/business?Title=Air-quality-regulators-OK-new-Calpine-power-plants-&amp;tc=ar" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20120507/BUSINESS/120509658/1036/business?Title=Air-quality-regulators-OK-new-Calpine-power-plants-_amp_tc=ar&amp;referer=');">Press Democrat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11097/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Geysers_Calpine_plant-300x225.jpg" length="20991" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>University of Nevada Reno hosting 2nd National Geothermal Academy</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11075</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11075#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotheraml]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Geothermal Academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Nevada Reno]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The University of Nevada Reno will be hosting the second National Geothermal Academy in Reno, Nevada June 18- August 10, 2012 featuring high level instructors and topics across the whole width of geothermal project development. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Announced last week, the University of Nevada in Reno is going to host the 2nd National Geothermal Academy this summer, inviting scientists, engineers and students.</p>
<p>The program starts June 18 and ends August 10, 2012. It features 8 modules of various elements on geothermal energy project development.</p>
<p>The University was chosen to host the eight-week session of courses last year by a cooperative of top geothermal schools due to its expertise in geothermal research and exploration and the abundance of geothermal activity in Nevada. Nevada has the largest amount of geothermal energy of any state in the nation, with local and national leaders pledging support and funding to help develop the technology necessary to both increase energy production and reduce its cost.</p>
<p>Last year the academy attracted a global audience due to increased demands for geothermal energy across the world.</p>
<p>&#8220;The National Geothermal Academy is drawing a strong student audience again in 2012, and international participation has increased significantly,&#8221; said Wendy Calvin, Director of the Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy. &#8220;We are creating a program that will benefit geothermal development not just in the state, but nationwide and worldwide.&#8221;</p>
<p>The academy runs from June 18 to Aug. 10, and features a wide variety of geothermal professionals and professors, including personnel from Cornell University, the University of Calgary, Southern Methodist University, the Oregon Institute of Technology, Stanford University, the University of Utah, and West Virginia University, as well as recognized industry leaders and consultants.</p>
<p>Attendees will visit a number of geothermal power production sites and plants to learn about the engineering and financing aspects of geothermal production. Topics covered during the eight-week course include geothermal energy utilization, geothermal geology and geochemistry, geophysics, drilling and reservoir engineering, power plant design and construction and environmental policy principles.</p>
<p>For more information about the academy, visit <a href="http://www.unr.edu/geothermal/NGA.htm" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.unr.edu/geothermal/NGA.htm?referer=');">http://www.unr.edu/geothermal/NGA.htm</a></p>
<p>Source: University of Nevada, Reno via <a href="http://www.altenergymag.com/news/2012/05/03/university-of-nevada-reno-hosting-second-national-geothermal-academy/24461" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.altenergymag.com/news/2012/05/03/university-of-nevada-reno-hosting-second-national-geothermal-academy/24461?referer=');">AltEnergyMag</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11075/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/NationalGeothermalAcademy2011_students-300x225.jpg" length="24447" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii close to give environmental exemptions for geothermal development</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11072</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11072#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ormat Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hawaii State Environmental Council is looking at approving environmental exemptions that would allow the State Land Department to drop costly environmental assessments from geothermal exploration projects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported locally, strict environmental regulations in Hawaii have resulted in a lack of investment, due to the cost in time and money for developers.</p>
<p>The subcommittee of the state Environmental Council now heard from potential geothermal developers in the state on why the State Land Department should be allowed to waive certain environmental regulations.</p>
<p>The cost and timelines of the current rules make it restrictive to explore in this state,&#8221; said Bill Sherman, land manager for Ormat Technolgies, that owns the 30 megawatt geothermal plant in Puna on the Big Island.</p>
<p>After hearing testimony, the seven member subcommittee approved three environmental exemptions for geothermal exploration. They include non-invasive testing and analysis, the issuance of leases on state or reserved lands, and the drilling of exploration wells.&#8221;</p>
<p>On May 17, the full 15-member Environmental Council is to approve the exemptions, which would allow the State Land Department to drop costly environmental assessments from geothermal exploration projects.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.kitv.com/news/hawaii/Environmental-exemptions-for-geothermal-energy-near-final-approval/-/8905354/12560692/-/qkwsp8/-/index.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.kitv.com/news/hawaii/Environmental-exemptions-for-geothermal-energy-near-final-approval/-/8905354/12560692/-/qkwsp8/-/index.html?referer=');">KITV</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11072/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/PunaGeothermalplant_Hawaii-300x195.jpg" length="22349" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enel inaugurates Stillwater hybrid solar and geothermal power plant</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11070</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11070#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Churchill County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enel Green Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stillwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enel Green Power inaugurated its Stillwater hybrid solar and geothermal power plant in Nevada at a ceremony with the North American head of Enel and the Governor for the state. The plant is the world's first combined solar-geothermal power plant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Enel Green Power inaugurated its solar-geothermal plant at Stillwater, Nevada. It is the world&#8217;s first plant of this kind.</p>
<p>The head of Enel Green Power North America, Francesco Venturini and Governor Brian Sandoval were present at the inauguration ceremony at the plant and praised the plant for its unique combination of two renewable energy sources for power generation.</p>
<p>The combined plant has an installed capacity of 26 MW. At the ceremony Venturini said: “The integration of the two technologies brings significant benefits such as increasing production when thermal efficiency of he geothermal unit is lowest; more delivery during peak hours, enabling a more load-following production profile; cost savings due to shared infrastructure including transmission interconnection, and less environmental footprint per unit of renewable energy produce and delivered.”</p>
<p>He further praised the local utility NV Energy, the community and how Churchill County has backed the completion. The support of Senator Harry Reid also was very welcome along the way.</p>
<p>Video:<br />
<iframe frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/embed/iframe?pf_id=&#038;show_title=0&#038;va_id=3467564&#038;windows=1" width="425" height="330"></iframe></p>
<p>Source and further details about the plant: <a href="http://www.lahontanvalleynews.com/article/20120503/NEWS/120509971/1055&amp;ParentProfile=1045" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.lahontanvalleynews.com/article/20120503/NEWS/120509971/1055_amp_ParentProfile=1045?referer=');">Lahonton Valley News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11070/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Stillwater_plant_Enel_AtlasCopco-300x197.png" length="118097" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GRC opens nominations for GRC Awards 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11066</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11066#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Resources Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRC Annual Meeting 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRC Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) opens nominations for the 2012 GRC Awards, to recognize distinguished colleagues in the geothermal community from around the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent release the Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) announces &#8220;the opening of nominations for this year&#8217;s GRC Awards. The awards recognize distinguished colleagues in the geothermal community from around the world and have been a highlight of the geothermal calendar since the late 1970s.</p>
<p>The winners will honored at the GRC Annual Member Meeting and Awards Luncheon, the climax to the GRC Annual Meeting being held at the Peppermill Resort Spa in Reno, Nevada, USA from September 30 &#8211; October 3. The theme for this year&#8217;s meeting is Geothermal: Reliable, Renewable, Global.</p>
<p>&#8220;The recipients of these awards often have a lifetime of achievement in the geothermal academic, scientific and commercial communities&#8221;, said GRC Interim Executive Director Steve Ponder. &#8220;The GRC Awards recognizes the contributions of these individuals to the geothermal sector.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Joseph W. Aidlin Award recognizes outstanding contributions to the Geothermal Resources Council and to the development of geothermal resources.</p>
<p>The Geothermal Pioneer Award is given for outstanding achievements in the development of geothermal resources. It recognizes the pioneering efforts of members of the geothermal community who have made lasting contributions to the industry, worldwide.</p>
<p>The Henry J. Ramey, Jr. Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Award recognizes outstanding achievements in the field of geothermal reservoir engineering.</p>
<p>The Ben Holt Geothermal Power Plant Award honors outstanding achievement in the field of geothermal power plant design and construction.</p>
<p>The Special Achievement Award recognizes special or outstanding achievements in any aspect of geothermal energy development and related areas.</p>
<p>More information on the GRC Awards, including a nomination form, can be found on the GRC website [www.geothermal.org . The deadline for nominations is June 29, 2012.</p>
<p>Source: GRC release via <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/07/prweb9478268.DTL#ixzz1uGyJ05p6" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/07/prweb9478268.DTL_ixzz1uGyJ05p6&amp;referer=');">SF Gate</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11066/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/GRCAwards2011_winners-300x199.jpg" length="20554" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Petty on the exciting things ahead for AltaRock Energy</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11053</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11053#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AltaRock Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced geothermal systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Petty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this interview with ThinkGeoEnergy, Susan Petty, the CEO of AltaRock Energy discusses the company's Newberry project in Oregon, the technology it has been developing and the potential for it being provided as a service to conventional geothermal projects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years I have been following AltaRock Energy and its activities. I also had the pleasure meeting the CEO of the company Susan Petty at various events over the years. So I am very grateful for the chance I had to receive a bit more insight into the company&#8217;s project and activities as part of a recent interview with her.</p>
<p>I think one of the interesting points I remember discussing with Susan on several occasions are the implications of EGS technology and the potential of using EGS technology for conventional geothermal projects today.</p>
<p><strong>With the milestone of BLM approval now in place for the Newberry project, can you tell about the next steps for the project?</strong></p>
<p>The next step in the Newberry Demonstrations is to drill four new boreholes and deepen a fifth for microseismic array (MSA). There are already an additional four boreholes that have already been drilled. Because the water table is very deep at Newberry and the surficial volcanic rocks attenuate seismic energy, these boreholes must be drilled to at least 700 feet. There is still 2-3 feet of snow at the drill sites, so we first need to plow out the roads. We will also be ordering seismic equipment and other long-lead items this month.</p>
<p>The seismic equipment should be delivered about the same time the final borehole is completed. Then we will install and test the MSA. As MSA near completion, other equipment, such as the pumps, water supply piping, and high pressure wellhead will arrive and be installed. If everything goes well, we will be ready to stimulate the EGS well in early fall. The season is short at Newberry, since the well site is at an elevation of 5800 ft (1800 m) and it usually starts snowing in November, so we hope to finish up before the snow accumulates again.</p>
<p><strong>AltaRock is acting as a project developer but also develops new technology that helps to create geothermal reservoirs. Could you maybe give us a little more details?</strong></p>
<p>Our primary focus is developing and using the technology for multi-zone stimulation. That includes technologies that we have developed ourselves, such as the thermally-degradable zonal isolation materials and hydroshearing modeling software, plus tools that we have incorporated into our EGS solution package, such as DTS (Distributed Temperature Sensing) and the MSA.</p>
<p>The US Department of Energy is funding about half of the cost of the Newberry EGS Demonstration which includes stimulation of the existing injector in 2012, drilling two production wells in 2013, and then running a circulation test on the triplet. If the circulation test results are as promising as we hope they will be, AltaRock and the lease owner, Davenport Newberry, will be looking for additional partners to continue development of the resource.</p>
<p><strong>The EGS technology is not only interesting for the development of pure EGS projects, but could also help with conventional projects. Could you maybe elaborate a little on how your technology could help conventional geothermal projects?</strong></p>
<p>Every conventional project has some wells that can be improved, either by increasing the well’s production or injection capacity. And the wells’ problems are often the same as in EGS, a single zone takes or produces most of the fluid. Further, typical geothermal completions, long open-holes or uncemented, slotted liners, limit the options to cost-effectively isolate the existing productive zone or zones, and stimulate new zones. Therefore, operators are very interested when we tell them that we have a new solution to make their idle wells productive, which does not require a rig for redrilling, recompleting, or installing packers.</p>
<p><strong>The current market conditions for geothermal in North America are not easy and developers have problems raising the necessary financing to develop their projects. Is AltaRock exploring developing projects outside the U.S.?</strong></p>
<p>We have been having conversations with developers on four continents about using our technologies. Each field success (we already have two), makes it easier to tell the story of our technology and garner interest from developers worldwide. Although the Newberry EGS Demonstration is a focus of the company in 2012, we also plan to do at least two other stimulations this year and hopefully up to five.</p>
<p><strong>As a technology provider, when will your technology be available to developers and are you planning to sell it as a service or product?</strong></p>
<p>Our technology is available as a service now! Overseas especially, the best value for the developer and quickest path to implement our solution will be the service model. Because our technology requires a multi-disciplinary, integrated plan and implementation, we don’t think the product model would be successful at this point in geothermal. We are rigging up right now to do a stimulation on a low productivity conventional geothermal well and are planning another one.</p>
<p>I would like to thank Susan for taking the time for providing this great insight into what is going on at AltaRock.</p>
<p>To follow the company&#8217;s activities check out its Facebook page at: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/NewberryEGS" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.facebook.com/NewberryEGS?referer=');">http://www.facebook.com/<wbr>NewberryEGS</wbr></a> and the blog at : <a href="http://blog.newberrygeothermal.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.newberrygeothermal.com/?referer=');">http://blog.<wbr>newberrygeothermal.com</wbr></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11053/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Newberry_AltaRock_BHTV_rig_up-300x225.jpg" length="17946" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student teams selected under U.S. Geothermal Student Competition</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11046</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11046#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Geothermal Student Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Geothermal Student Competition in the U.S. has chosen ten student teams to enter phase two of the competition with the topic to address the use of one or more exploration technologies to develop a geothermal system in Idaho's Snake River Plain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a note on the National Geothermal Student Competition, student teams were required &#8220;to develop professional-quality research report that address the use of one or more exploration technologies &#8211; from the files of geophysics, geochemistry, remote sensing and geology &#8211; to develop a geothermal system in Idaho&#8217;s Snake River Plain.&#8221;</p>
<p>The competition is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. and is to &#8220;spark interest in geothermal careers and education&#8221; and the findings by the groups might then &#8220;be used by industry to develop new geothermal sites.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the competition now 10 student teams receive a $10,000 research stipend to cover expenses as they complete phase two of the competition and submit their reports by August 31, 2012.&#8221; The top three reports will then represent their results at the GRC Annual Meeting in September/ October 2012 in Reno, Nevada.</p>
<p>Details about the teams and the topics can be found via the link below.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.rdmag.com/News/Feeds/2012/04/general-sciences-two-student-teams-selected-for-federal-geothermal-/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rdmag.com/News/Feeds/2012/04/general-sciences-two-student-teams-selected-for-federal-geothermal-/?referer=');">R&amp;D Mag</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11046/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/SnakeRiverPlain_Idaho-300x225.jpg" length="22460" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Service Co of New Mexico plans entering PPA with Lightning Dock project</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11042</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11042#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrq Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightning Dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ormat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Service Co. of New Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utility Public Service Co. of New Mexico announces it intends to enter a 20-year Power Purchase Agreement with Cyrq Energy for the 10 MW Lightning Dock geothermal power plant currently being build and expected to be operational by January 2014.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported locally, the Public Service Co. of New Mexico intends to enter a 20 years power purchase agreement from a planned 10 MW geothermal power plant. The Lightning Dock Geothermal project at Lorsdbourg New Mexico, is being built by Cyrq Energy (formerly Raser Technologies). The plant is provided and built by Ormat Technologies under an EPC contract.</p>
<p>The company expects the plant to be online by January 2014.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2012/05/pnm-to-add-solar-geothermal-power-to-generation-mix.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.power-eng.com/articles/2012/05/pnm-to-add-solar-geothermal-power-to-generation-mix.html?referer=');">Power Engineering</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11042/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/LightningDock_Raser_drilling-300x224.jpg" length="24361" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possibilities of private development in Mexico at GeoPower Mexico, May 15, 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11037</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11037#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoPower Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican International Renewable Energy Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIREC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The inaugural GeoPower Mexico event, which is part of this year's Mexican International Renewable Energy Congress will discuss geothermal resources in Mexico and possibilities for private development in the country.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of this years Mexican International Renewable Energy Congress (MIREC), GeoPower Mexico will be featuring geothermal energy in Mexico, with a high level set of speakers.</p>
<p>Speakers at the geothermal part of the event include Eduardo Iglesias of IIE, Peter Malin of the University of Auckland, Luis C.A. Guitiérrez-Negrín and José Luis Quijano of the Mexican Geothermal Association, and Enrique Guzman Lara of CRE.</p>
<p>Topics covered include: Understanding the Mexican Resource, Possibilities for private geothermal development and key learnings of geothermal contracts of 2011.</p>
<p>Details about the event can be found here.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.greenpowerconferences.com/EF/?sSubSystem=Prospectus&amp;sEventCode=GE1205MX&amp;sSessionID=f4e0330105e9693cc0d0cfb70c1c887a-11654714&amp;sDocument=Agenda" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.greenpowerconferences.com/EF/?sSubSystem=Prospectus_amp_sEventCode=GE1205MX_amp_sSessionID=f4e0330105e9693cc0d0cfb70c1c887a-11654714_amp_sDocument=Agenda&amp;referer=');">Green Power Conferences</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11037/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MexicoCity_Cathedral_Mexico-300x199.jpg" length="21805" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Forest Service seeks public comments on Mount Baker site in Washington</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11033</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11033#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Land Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Forest Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Forest Service seeks public comments for potential leasing 5,500 acres of land for geothermal development at Mount Baker, Washington in the U.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported by local media last month, the U.S. Forest Service is seeking public comments on whether forest land near Mount Baker in Washington would be suitable for the development of geothermal power projects.</p>
<p>The proposal as part of a &#8220;Consent to lease&#8221; has been published on the <a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=38973" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=38973&amp;referer=');">Forest Service Website</a>, and states that the potential plant sites could be &#8220;sited on 15-25 acre plots&#8221;, on the southeast side of Mount Baker, west of Baker Lake.</p>
<p>Currently only the potential leasing by the Bureau of Land Management is considered, to establish how environmental impacts could be minimized. The lease could open 5,500 acres to power companies. There will be an additional public comment period &#8220;when specific exploration wells or plants are proposed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Public comments can be submitted until May 20, 2012 to eozog@fs.fed.us</p>
<p>In 2010 the Forest Service authorized geothermal leasing on 8,355 acres in the same area, west of Baker Lake. No proposals for exploration or development have been received so far.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/04/23/2493448/comments-sought-on-mount-baker.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/04/23/2493448/comments-sought-on-mount-baker.html?referer=');">Bellingham Herald</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11033/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/MountBaker_Washington-300x225.jpg" length="21054" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geothermal mining lease could be released at Pohoiki, Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11026</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11026#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Land and Natural Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal mining lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pohoiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puna Geothermal Venture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hawaii state Board of Land and Natural Resources considers the issue of a new geothermal mining lease for a state property at Pohoiki, Hawaii in proximity to the state's only geothermal power plant of Puna Geothermal Venture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might be new development in proximity to the site of Hawaii&#8217;s only geothermal power plant at Pohoiki.</p>
<p>According to local news the state Board of Land and Natural Resources is expected to consider today to grant a new geothermal mining lease for the state property in Pohoiki where the first producing geothermal well was drilled in the 1970s.</p>
<p>&#8220;The experimental HGP-A well went on-line in 1982, generating approximately 3 megawatts, roughly enough to power 1,500 homes.</p>
<p>Originally developed through a private-public partnership under the leadership of the US Department of Energy, in 1986 HGP-A was transferred to the state Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii.</p>
<p>Although it was designed to run for only two years, HGP-A continued producing electricity for eight years.</p>
<p>Rather than extend the geothermal mining lease, the staff of the Department of Land and Natural Resources has recommended cancelling the old lease for the HGP-A site and issuing a new one for 65 years. That will be taken up by the land board when it meets Friday in Honolulu.</p>
<p>Barbour said if the new lease is granted, NELHA plans to put out a request for information from companies interested in using the HGP-A site.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the full article and details see link below.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://bigislandnow.com/2012/04/25/old-geothermal-site-up-for-new-lease/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/bigislandnow.com/2012/04/25/old-geothermal-site-up-for-new-lease/?referer=');">Big Island Now</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11026/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/PunaGeothermalplant_Hawaii-300x195.jpg" length="22349" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E cancels PPA with Terra-Gen on Nevada geothermal project</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11021</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11021#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ArcLight Capital Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terra-Gen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Californian utility PG&#038;E has cancelled a power purchase agreement with Arclight Capital Partners unit Terra-Gen Power for a geothermal power plant close to Reno, Nevada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. utility PG&amp;E announces it has told regulators in the state of California that &#8220;it has terminated a geothermal-power contract with Arclight Capital Partners LLC unit Terra-Gen Power.</p>
<p>Terra-Gen had signed a 25-year PPA with the utility in 2010 under which the company was to build a 53 MW geothermal power plant near Reno in the state of Nevada. It was expected that the company would start delivering power under the contract in 2013. The price agreed on at the time was more than 11.25 cents per kWh as filed with the California Public Utilities Commission.</p>
<p>PG&amp;E now reported that the contract had been terminated and the utility had withdrawn its previous request for approval of the contract.</p>
<p>Californian utilities and among them PG&amp;E are required to source 33% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Geothermal is a popular source of energy for utilities under the scheme as it is able to deliver power around the clock.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2012/04/25/pge-cancels-terra-gen-geothermal-power-contract/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.foxbusiness.com/news/2012/04/25/pge-cancels-terra-gen-geothermal-power-contract/?referer=');">Fox Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11021/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/DixieValley_plant_TerraGen_Nevada-300x151.jpg" length="23075" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuji Electric invests $10 million in Hudson Ranch II project by EnergySource</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11018</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11018#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnergySource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hudson Ranch II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imperial Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuji Electric invests $10 million into the Hudson Ranch II geothermal power project by EnergySource in the Imperial Valley in California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Announced by both companies yesterday, Japanese turbine manufacturer Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. has made a $10 million investment in the geothermal power plant project Hudson Ranch II by EnergySource in the Imperial Valley, California in the U.S.</p>
<p>Fuji, as reported earlier this week, plans to strengthen its position supplying the industry its turbine technology through this investment. At the same time it proves the confidence the company has in the project and capabilities of EnergySource, that brought its Hudson Ranch I plant online this spring.</p>
<p>EnergySource plans to commence drilling mid-year for Hudson Ranch II, with plant construction to begin in 2013 and commercial operations in 2015. Like its recently completed Hudson Ranch I project, in which EnergySource first selected Fuji Electric steam turbine generator equipment, the new plant will generate 49 MW from one of the largest and highest temperature geothermal resources in North America, the Salton Sea resource in Imperial County, California. Fuji Electric is a leading supplier of steam turbine generator equipment to the geothermal sector and its investment will support EnergySource’s advancement of the Hudson Ranch II project.</p>
<p>“Fuji Electric supports accelerating renewable energy projects in the area of power generation. The company is committed to expanding and growing its geothermal power plant business as a major emphasis for the company,” said Naoto Yoneyama, Managing Executive Officer &amp; Director of Fuji Electric. “With EnergySource’s successful commercial launch of Hudson Ranch I last month, Fuji Electric saw a great opportunity to invest in development of the second plant.”</p>
<p>Hudson Ranch I and Hudson Ranch II will each generate enough power to serve 50,000 homes in the Southwestern region.</p>
<p>“EnergySource is looking forward to bringing its second geothermal plant on-line and continuing to design and operate power plants in this very robust and dependable resource,” said Dave Watson, president and CEO of EnergySource. “Fuji Electric’s investment in our project will accelerate our timeline and our larger development plans to bring new capacity to California and Southwestern utilities in order to meet their state-mandated renewable energy requirements through the delivery of geothermal power.”</p>
<p>Source: EnergySource company release</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11018/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/HudsonRanchI_March-2012-300x198.jpg" length="18436" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ft Liard project by Borealis GeoPower in Canada featured on TV</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11015</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11015#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CanGEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borealis GeoPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ft Liard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwest Territories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent public hearing by Canadian Borealis GeoPower on its Ft Liard geothermal combined power and heat project in the Northwest Territories was featured on national TV station CBC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian geothermal development and service company Borealis GeoPower announces that it held an all-day public hearing in Ft. Liard, Northwest Territories. The company is developing a project there and held the meeting as part of the permitting process.</p>
<p>The project, pending permitting and timing, could be the first geothermal power generation project in Canada. As Borealis explained to Richard Gleeson of CBC News during the broadcast, the project hopes to be the first of many, with lots of potential existing in Canada’s North that would be able to offset power generation from diesel fuel sources.</p>
<p>To view the news segment, please click <a title="CBC news ft liard" href="http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/Canada/North/1305554399/ID=2226845615" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cbc.ca/video/_/News/Canada/North/1305554399/ID=2226845615?referer=');">here</a> and then fast forward to the 35 minute mark of the broadcast.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.borealisgeopower.com/news/details/borealis-ft-liard-nwt-project-covered-by-cbc-news-north/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.borealisgeopower.com/news/details/borealis-ft-liard-nwt-project-covered-by-cbc-news-north/?referer=');">Borealis GeoPower</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11015/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CraigDunn_Interview_CBC-300x170.jpg" length="12897" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuji Electric buys into geothermal developer and operator in the US</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11001</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11001#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=11001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuji Electric aims to strengthen its position in the geothermal turbine supplier market by investment into a geothermal developer and operator of plants in the U.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported by Nikkei in Japan, Fuji Electric one of the top geothermal turbine suppliers has announced it will invest into a geothermal developer and operator of geothermal plants in the United States.</p>
<p>This step aims to strengthen its position in the global geothermal equipment market. There is no announcement of the name of the developer, but we will try to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/11001/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/HSOrka_turbine_arrival-300x198.jpg" length="24829" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geothermal heat a viable option for Canadian city of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10985</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10985#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CanGEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Con Mine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwest Territories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vito Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellowknife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belgian engineering firm Vito Engineering confirms the viability of a geothermal heating project at an abandoned coal mine in the city of Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories, Canada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported by national news outlet CBC, a Belgium firm has confirmed that the heat found in the old Con Mine represents a viable heating source for the city of Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories.</p>
<p>Vito Engineering, says &#8220;there is enough geothermal heat &#8230; to heat parts of the city&#8217;s downtown&#8221;. The company has done research to answer some critical voices that were quoting temperature readings of the mine were too old. The new research shows that there is &#8220;1.7 MW thermal energy which could be used to heat city buildings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yellowknife city councillor Mark Heyck said there&#8217;s also something new that came out of Vito&#8217;s report.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because we would only be heating for eight or nine months of the year, you could use those remaining summer months to actually recharge the underground workings. It would basically become an energy storage battery that would be charged over the summer,&#8221; Heyck said.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s various methods of doing that; could be using waste heat from some location, or solar thermal collectors that charge the underground which actually expands the size of the resource available to us when we need it in the winter time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heyck said confirming the temperatures in the defunct mine is only one step in the process.</p>
<p>“But certainly talking to the end use customers, those building owners in the downtown core who would ultimately use the energy. That’s going to be a big milestone for us once we bring those folks on side,” he said.</p>
<p>The city also still hopes to secure federal funding for the project.&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as I remember there was some funding available of around $14 million, which would have had to see additional debt financing by the city. This was previously voted against in a public referendum among the citizens of the city in the spring of 2011.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2012/04/23/north-con-mine-geothermal-belgian-firm.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2012/04/23/north-con-mine-geothermal-belgian-firm.html?referer=');">CBC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10985/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Yellowknife_NWT_Canada-300x200.jpg" length="21202" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emotions high on public hearing on geothermal development in Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10979</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10979#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pahoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent public hearing on geothermal development on Hawaii Island saw emotions boiling high with voices raised for and against development on the island.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported from Hawaii, a recent public hearing on geothermal development in Pahoa on Hawaii Island saw the turn out of a large crowd of people objecting further geothermal development on the island.</p>
<p>But there were also positive voices in the meeting that support further development.</p>
<p>On the Big Island Video News website there is a video to be found taken at the meeting with the voices of the public present.</p>
<p>Source and Link to Video: <a href="http://www.bigislandvideonews.com/2012/04/25/video-hundreds-pack-puna-hearing-on-geothermal-development/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.bigislandvideonews.com/2012/04/25/video-hundreds-pack-puna-hearing-on-geothermal-development/?referer=');">Big Island Video News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10979/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/HawaiiGeothermalWorkingGroup_meeting-300x168.jpg" length="24603" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ormat Technologies selected for $62 million EPC contract</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10977</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10977#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ormat Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ormat Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ormat Technologies reports that its subsidiary Ormat Nevada has been selected for a $62 million EPC contract in a competitive bid process for a geothermal project in North America.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release, Ormat Technologies, announced that Ormat Nevada Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary, was selected to supply a $61.2 million engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract through a competitive bid process. [There is no concrete project named nor a location, but it is assumed that it is a project in Nevada]</p>
<p>Under the expected EPC contract, which is currently under negotiation, Ormat will provide two air-cooled Ormat Energy Converters for a geothermal power plant project in North America.</p>
<p>The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2013. Until the signature of the full EPC contract the parties have entered into an interim agreement in the amount of approximately $9 million for a limited scope of work to ensure timely completion of the project.</p>
<p>Yoram Bronicki, president and COO of Ormat said, &#8220;We are pleased to increase our backlog by this project which will continue the strong product segment performance. This development will incorporate Ormat&#8217;s low-operating-cost design and our consistent project completion standards.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ormat-signs-agreement-for-north-american-geothermal-power-plant-project-2012-04-25" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/ormat-signs-agreement-for-north-american-geothermal-power-plant-project-2012-04-25?referer=');">Company release via Marketwatch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10977/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Landau_geothermalplant_Germany-300x225.jpg" length="21254" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wyoming site of co-produced fluids demonstration project by RMOTC</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10970</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10970#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMOTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center in  Casper, Wyoming is testing small geothermal binary units for the production of electricity from oil &#038; gas wells, utilizing co-produced water from oil &#038; gas operations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Energy runs a technology test center in proximity to an old petroleum reserve in Wyoming. The Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC) is the site of a demonstration project that is testing the utilization of co-produced fluids (water as a by-product from oil and gas wells) for the generation of geothermal power.</p>
<p>The oil and gas industry has forever seen water as an unwanted by-product of its production and has mostly seen it as a waste by-product. With increasing energy cost, this &#8211; in most of the cases &#8211; hot water, could be utilized for power generation in binary systems. So with stimulus funding the RMOTC is now testing a variety of different binary units for the generation of power from wells co-producing oil and water.</p>
<p>With proving this technology thousands of abandoned oil &amp; gas wells, or wells still in production could be used as a new source of clean energy. For this one has to know that areas like Texas and many other regions in the U.S and globally essentially have a large number of oil and gas wells that could easily serve as a source of energy. Oil and gas companies always have collected a large number of data sets for each well they drilled that they actually have probably a better understanding of the geothermal potential than most of the geological surveys in those regions or countries. While there are states and countries that make it a requirement that those drilling data sets are be shared, in many geographical regions this has not been the case. So the vast amount of data held by the oil companies, could show a tremendous value, for the oil and gas companies, but also for the general drive to cleaner sources of power.</p>
<p>In the U.S. it is estimated that there about 800,000 oil and gas fields with probably a marg-fold number of wells drilled, which could be in the millions.</p>
<p>Traditionally the water found in oil &amp; gas production is hot, but not hot enough to utilize steam for electricity generation. Therefore binary systems are used. Those utilize a fluid that boils at lower temperatures, which in turn turn a turbine and attached generator for electricity generation. As those binary systems are a closed-loop system, they have no emissions.</p>
<p>The demonstration unit at RMOTC today produces about 250 kW of power. RMOTC works with industry, academics and others to field test a variety of products and processes near Casper, Wyoming.</p>
<p>The interesting element for utilizing this technology for geothermal, would be that one would be able to save the drilling cost for those power projects, as wells have already been drilled. So while the current unit is small and generates little electricity, a production-scale unit could handle more water and producer more electricity.</p>
<p>For oil &amp; gas production this could mean that parts of its energy need could be fueled by hot water from oil &amp; gas wells, making it a bit of a greener source of energy.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/old-oil-fields-could-be-geothermal-power-source/article_31bb6274-9a00-5c4f-a4ac-9d081ebee979.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/wyoming/old-oil-fields-could-be-geothermal-power-source/article_31bb6274-9a00-5c4f-a4ac-9d081ebee979.html?referer=');">Billings Gazette</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10970/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/rmotc_wyoming_coproduced-300x218.jpg" length="20775" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GRC Annual Meeting 2012 Call for papers deadline May 4, 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10965</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10965#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call for papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRC Annual Meeting 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Geothermal Resources Council reminds of the deadline of May 4, 2012 for its call for papers for the GRC Annual Meeting 2012 in Reno, Nevada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) invites you to present your latest technical work in geothermal research, exploration, development and utilization at GRC’s 36<sup>th</sup> Annual Meeting September 30- October 3, 2012 at the Peppermill Resort in Reno, Nevada, USA. Our theme this year is “Geothermal: Reliable, Renewable, Global”</p>
<p>Successful selection to present at the GRC 2012 Annual Meeting is prestigious and recognizes the presenter as a top industry expert. International participation is key to the success of the GRC Annual Meeting technical programs and we encourage geothermal researchers and experts from around the world to submit their work for consideration to be presented at the GRC 2012 Annual Meeting.</p>
<p>ANYONE WHO WANTS TO PRESENT A PAPER AT THE GRC ANNUAL MEETING MUST SUBMIT A PAPER! PLEASE NOTE, THE GRC IS NO LONGER REQUIRING AN ABSTRACT TO BE SUBMITTED FIRST.  WE ARE REQUIRING COMPLETED DRAFTPAPERS AS THE FIRST STEP.</p>
<p>Authors may submit an oral technical presentation and/or poster at the GRC’s 2012 Annual Meeting.</p>
<p>The Draft Paper submission deadline is May 4, 2012.</p>
<p>Please direct all content related questions to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Frank Monastero at <a href="mailto:monasterofc@gmail.com" target="_blank">monasterofc@gmail.com</a></li>
<li>Lisa Shevenell at <a href="mailto:lisaas@unr.edu" target="_blank">lisaas@unr.edu</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Please direct all format and general submission questions to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Anh Lay at <a href="mailto:alay@geothermal.org" target="_blank">alay@geothermal.org</a> or <a href="tel:%28530%29%20758-2360%20ext.%20100" target="_blank">(530) 758-2360 ext. 100</a></li>
</ul>
<div>2012 Paper Topics</div>
<ul>
<ul>
<li>Business Development / Finance</li>
<li>Basin &amp; Range / Cascades / Rocky Mountains</li>
<li>Direct Use / Heat Pump</li>
<li>Enhanced Geothermal Systems</li>
<li>Exploration / Resource Assessment / Management</li>
<li>Geology, Geophysics and Geochemistry</li>
<li>Geothermal Energy Associated with Oil and Gas Operations</li>
<li>Geothermal Project Case Studies</li>
<li>International</li>
<li>Power Operations / Maintenance / Production Technologies</li>
<li>Regulatory / Environmental Compliance / Policy Issues</li>
<li>Utility and Transmission Issues</li>
<li>Other _____________</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBMIT YOUR DRAFT PAPER:</p>
<p>To Submit Electronically (preferred):</p>
<p>-Email your completed draft paper and submission form to Anh Lay at <a href="mailto:alay@geothermal.org" target="_blank">alay@geothermal.org</a> by May 4, 2012</p>
<ol>
<li>A completed draft paper with all illustrations (including tables, figures, charts, photos, and maps) embedded within the text. The file must be in word or PDF format.</li>
<ul>
<li>Please include a minimum of 5-10 keywords below the title and author(s) on the first page of your paper(s).</li>
<li>References to published literature must be fully cited at the end of the paper. Unreliable sources such as Wikipedia must never be cited.</li>
</ul>
<li>A Completed <a href="http://geothermal.informz.net/z/cjUucD9taT0yMTA2NTgwJnA9MSZ1PTEwMTg0NDAyNDQmbGk9MTAwNDM0NTQ/index.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/geothermal.informz.net/z/cjUucD9taT0yMTA2NTgwJnA9MSZ1PTEwMTg0NDAyNDQmbGk9MTAwNDM0NTQ/index.html?referer=');">submission form</a> (please remember to save after you filled out the form and then email the saved form).</li>
</ol>
<p>Source: Geothermal Resources Council</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10965/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Reno_view_Nevada-300x201.jpg" length="25846" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Canadian climate change plans all over the map</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10923</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CanGEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Suzuki Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwest Territories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saskatchewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yukon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new report Canadian David Suzuki Foundation reports on the various climate change plans of Canadian provinces and territories, pointing out the lack of sufficient federal support and insufficient efforts in Alberta and Saskatchewan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new report by the David Suzuki Foundation in Canada, looks at the different climate change efforts in the various provinces and territories in Canada.</p>
<p>The David Suzuki Foundation is a non-government foundation focused on environmental protection, climate change and nature conservation and a leading force in the Canadian climate change debate.</p>
<p>The recent report highlights the fact that indeed the provinces in Canada &#8220;are leading the way in the fight against climate change&#8221; and not the federal government.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the absence of significant national policies to combat climate change, some provinces are stepping in with their own plans and policies. But those plans vary widely, according to, &#8220;All Over the Map 2012: A Comparison of Provincial Climate Change Plans&#8221;, by the David Suzuki Foundation.</p>
<p>The report doesn&#8217;t rank any province as &#8220;Best&#8221; for its climate initiatives, but Quebec, Ontario and B.C. rank as &#8220;Very Good&#8221;, while Alberta and Saskatchewan rank as &#8220;Worst&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;The report shows that stronger leadership from the provinces is crucial given the lack of effort from the federal government,&#8221; said David Suzuki Foundation climate change and clean energy specialist Ian Bruce. &#8220;Applying the best policies and practices of the provinces on a national scale would benefit human health and the environment and would also provide a level playing field for businesses.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report highlights the fact that Alberta and Saskatchewan remain at the bottom of the list of Canadian provinces and the main drivers of Canada&#8217;s rising emissions because of the &#8220;continued reliance on polluting fossil fuel industries.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Leading provinces are prioritizing clean-energy policies that Canadians recognize are vital in the transition from overuse of natural resources to a cleaner, more innovative economy,&#8221; Bruce said. &#8220;These provinces show that Canada could make progress and become a world leader in solving global warming if the federal government joined forces.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report points particular fingers towards the federal government, highlighting the fact that any federal programs &#8211; &#8220;even when they exist &#8211; are ineffective and are getting weaker.&#8221;</p>
<p>When one looks at the geothermal potential in Canada, the provinces of particular interest and with resource potential are British Columbia (BC), Alberta, Saskatchewan and the Northwest Territories and the Yukon.</p>
<p>Of those only BC is still considered to be &#8220;very good&#8221; in the ranking of climate change legislation and efforts, while the Northwest Territories and Yukon are ranked &#8220;fair&#8221; or &#8220;poor&#8221;. But the main issue here are the provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan.</p>
<p>With its strong economic growth fueled by a growing oil sector, these provinces should be in the best position to support efforts on mitigating climate change and also could be considered in the  need of it as they are also the largest emitters in Canada.</p>
<p>So hopefully pointed criticism of an association like the David Suzuki Foundation will help wake up politicians in those provinces to support renewable energy technologies. Geothermal energy is a valid option in those provinces and should be supported under wider support schemes.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.davidsuzuki.org/media/news/2012/04/report-shows-provincial-climate-change-plans-all-over-the-map/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.davidsuzuki.org/media/news/2012/04/report-shows-provincial-climate-change-plans-all-over-the-map/?referer=');">David Suzuki Foundation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10923/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GHGemissions_Canada-300x187.jpg" length="17344" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeoTek Energy to field test Gravity Head Energy System this year</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10904</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10904#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binary systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoTek Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gravity Head Energy System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GeoTek Energy, a Texas company, is nearing completion of its design phase for a new technology called Gravity Head Energy System that is to eliminate power need for pumping in geothermal systems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GeoTek Energy, a geothermal technology firm, has been developing a system that is expected to reduce production expenses for geothermal energy by about 30 percent.</p>
<p>The company is now close to the completion of the design phase for its technology and is looking for a small geothermal well to test a scale model of the technology.</p>
<p>The company has made headlines in the last 12 months through adding industry veterans to its board including Lou Capuano (formerly CEO of ThermaSource) and Hezy Ram (formerly CEO of Ram Power).</p>
<p>The company is developing its technology, called Gravity Head Energy System (GHES), utilizing gravity instead of pumps to capture energy from geothermal water reservoirs to be utilized in a binary power system.</p>
<p>&#8220;In a conventional binary,&#8221; said Dave Marshall, CFO of GeoTek, &#8220;if you&#8217;re producing, say, two-and-a-half megawatts (enough to power roughly 2,500 homes), you&#8217;re using almost 500 kw to just run your production pump. That&#8217;s what is referred to as &#8216;parasitic load.&#8217;&#8221; He said another 110 kw is needed to run the working fluid pump, bringing the total parasitic load to 610 kw, or 24.4 percent of the total power produced. GeoTek states that, by eliminating those power needs, their system makes available 30 percent more power to the grid, a number arrived at by starting at the 1890 kwh actually available under standard systems and dividing the extra 610 kwh into that number.</p>
<p>The hot underground water still will flow to the surface in separate tubing from the heated working liquid. The water will then be reinjected in a well some distance away from the source well. The working liquid will be used to generate power, then recycled into the downhole heat exchanger.</p>
<p>With three liquid paths &#8212; the hot water flowing up and the working fluid cycling in both directions &#8212; the outside diameter of the well must be larger than most oil wells at a greater depth-13-3/8 OD down to as much as 2,000 feet. The GHES pump itself is only 5 inches OD.</p>
<p>While most traditional geothermal plants take five years to begin flowing power into the grid, Marshall expects the GHES system to begin producing power within two years of the start of construction and permitting.</p>
<p>The GHES system was first developed in the 1970s, during the first major energy crisis, but then shelved as the crisis eased. GeoTek, founded in 2004 by a group of local oil and gas investors who wanted to diversify their investments, wanted to further develop an existing system and bring it to market. After considering a number of possible technologies, the group decided to pursue the GHES model, in conjunction with engineers at Ortloff. The Ortloff engineers put their knowledge of gas processing procedures to work in the design, processes that are similar in many ways to the geothermal model, Marshall noted, citing heat transfer and thermosiphon loops in particular.</p>
<p>Years of development funded primarily by the investors began to appear on geothermal industry radar screens when, as Marshall stated, the engineers&#8217; progress was enough to attract the attention of the Department of Energy. Both the DOE and the industry gave the company more feedback on their system. &#8220;That brought us to the point where we are literally within nine months of doing a field test of a prototype unit,&#8221; Marshall said.</p>
<p>The DOE has helped with some funding to this point, said Ken Fryrear, GeoTek&#8217;s COO, but they are not prepared to completely fund the field test. &#8220;It will be on a cost-sharing basis,&#8221; Fryrear said. &#8220;We will pay 60 percent of the cost and they will pay 40 percent,&#8221; subject to how Congress decides to fund this type of research.</p>
<p>Because most geothermal activity in North America is in the west, the company expects that to be the location of the test. However, Marshall was quick to point out that the heat exchanger and other components likely will be produced in the Permian Basin. He also noted that, despite some similarity with oil and gas production, using an abandoned oil or gas well for either the pilot program or for long-term power generation is not currently practical.</p>
<p>The small demonstration unit will deliver only a little power, but its only purpose is to prove the concept and to let engineers determine where design improvements are needed. Marshall hopes to find a currently operating geothermal company that will let GeoTek use a small diameter well for 90-120 days for the test.</p>
<p>From there GeoTek will design commercial units in two sizes, available late in 2012 and early in 2013. &#8220;Then the plan is (for us) to act as a licensing company, where we will license that technology to companies that are already experienced in manufacturing a lot of the surface equipment like the turbine generators.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.mywesttexas.com/business/oil/article_b733b583-1fd0-5112-9e69-ddf3fe2c1d52.html#ixzz1srBvoXNC" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.mywesttexas.com/business/oil/article_b733b583-1fd0-5112-9e69-ddf3fe2c1d52.html_ixzz1srBvoXNC?referer=');">My West Texas</a>, under creative commons license: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0?referer=');">Attribution</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10904/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/GeoTek_website-300x175.jpg" length="15305" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industry leaders meet at U.S. GEA International Showcase, May 23, 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10897</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10897#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Geothermal Energy Showcase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At its annual International Geothermal Energy Showcase, the U.S. Geothermal Energy Association will welcome 200 international representatives from a number of the leading geothermal nations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next month, the Geothermal Energy Association (GEA) will hold its fourth annual <a href="http://www.gifttool.com/registrar/ShowEventDetails?ID=1872&amp;EID=11973" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.gifttool.com/registrar/ShowEventDetails?ID=1872_amp_EID=11973&amp;referer=');">International Geothermal Energy Showcase</a>. Hosted by GEA in alliance with the U.S. Trade and Development Agency, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Agency for International Development, U.S. Department of State, and the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the showcase will feature minister-level speakers from a number of leading geothermal countries.</p>
<p>In addition to World Bank and US agency officials, confirmed speakers for the event, to be held on May 23 at the Ronald Reagan Building &amp; International Trade Center in Washington, D.C., come from every region of the world. Confirmed speakers include Minister Emilio Rappaccioli, Ministry of Energy and Mining, Nicaragua; Dr. Fouad Ahmed aye, Minister of Energy and Water, Republic of Djibouti; Friedo Sielemann, Counselor, Energy and Environment, German Embassy; Freddy Saragih, Fiscal Policy Board, Ministry of Finance, Indonesia; Dr. Jerrol Thompson, Prime Minister’s Office St. Vincent &amp; Grenadines, and many more.</p>
<p>“The Showcase will bring together the key government and industry leaders who will be making decisions about building thousands of new megawatts of geothermal power,” said Karl Gawell, GEA Executive Director. &#8220;GEA is excited to welcome leaders from around the globe to share their practical and insightful geothermal success stories. This is an opportunity for us all to explore and learn from each other about the best policies and approaches to expand geothermal power domestically and abroad.”</p>
<p>The GEA also announced that POWER Engineers and Galena Advisors will serve as Gold Level Sponsors for the event. Headquartered in Hailey, Idaho, POWER Engineers is a global consulting engineering firm specializing in the delivery of integrated solutions for energy, food and beverage, facilities, communications, environmental and federal markets.</p>
<p>“The GEA International Showcase is the perfect setting to demonstrate that U.S. geothermal businesses are leading the way in inventing and supplying geothermal power plants being developed in other countries,” said Mike Long, vice president of Galena Advisors, a division of POWER Engineers. “We’re seeing a great shift in activity as U.S. engineers and suppliers take on new geothermal project work in fast-growing markets overseas. POWER Engineers tips its hat to GEA for its energetic leadership in getting these success stories told.”</p>
<p>The event program will highlight geothermal projects, policies and development from the world’s key geothermal markets including the Caribbean, Latin America, East Africa, Europe, Asia and the Pacific. The program will encourage interaction and discussion about government policies, projects in development, market potential and opportunities for U.S. companies. Attendees will also hear from U.S. government agencies involved in export assistance for geothermal companies, and from U.S. companies developing projects overseas.</p>
<p>Geothermal power presently supplies the world with 10,715 MW of electricity in 24 countries, on six continents, but the potential to use geothermal resources is even greater. In a 2010 International Market Update, GEA identified 70 countries with new projects under development or consideration.  With the technology available today and under development for the future, geothermal resources could supply more than 300,000 MW of power, while producing far fewer carbon emissions than from legacy sources. U.S. companies export geothermal goods and services throughout the world, and with strong support from the administration’s Renewable Energy Export Initiative, the U.S. industry’s position as an international leader should flourish.</p>
<p>To register for the International Geothermal Energy Showcase, or for more information, please visit <a href="http://geo-energy.org/events/GEA_ShowCase_05_23_12.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/geo-energy.org/events/GEA_ShowCase_05_23_12.aspx?referer=');">http://geo-energy.org/events/<wbr>GEA_ShowCase_05_23_12.aspx</wbr></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10897/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/RonaldReagan_Building_Washington-300x200.jpg" length="19883" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GRC announces 2012 Amateur Photo Contest</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10887</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10887#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkGeoEnergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Resources Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GRC is announcing its annual Amateur Photo Contest to showcase quality photography featuring geothermal energy around the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As every year the Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) is holding its annual Amateur Photo Contest. The purpose of the contest is to showcase quality photography featuring geothermal energy around the world.</p>
<p>The winners will be announced at the GRC Annual Member Meeting and Awards Luncheon, the climax to the <a title="GRC's 36th Annual Meeting" href="http://www.geothermal.org/meet-new.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.geothermal.org/meet-new.html?referer=');">GRC Annual Meeting</a> being held at the Peppermill Resort Spa in Reno, Nevada, USA from September 30 –October 3. The theme for this year’s meeting is Geothermal: Reliable, Renewable, Global.</p>
<p>The first place winner will receive $150, second place &#8211; $100, and third place &#8211; $75. Honorable Mention photos will receive certificates.</p>
<p>Photographs on any subject related to geothermal energy can be submitted such as geothermal energy production, EGS, Direct Use and geothermal heat pumps. These can include photos of well testing, drilling, operation of geothermal equipment, newly developed equipment, or plant operation, construction of a geothermal plant or plant site, and geological areas or surface manifestations (holding potential for geothermal exploration or development).</p>
<p><a title="More information on the GRC Amateur Photo Contest, including a submission form" href="http://www.geothermal.org/2012PhotoContest_Old.pdf" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.geothermal.org/2012PhotoContest_Old.pdf?referer=');">More information on the GRC Amateur Photo Contest, including a submission form</a>, can be found on the GRC website. The deadline for submissions is August 31, 2012. (another link: <a href="http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2012/04/13/9403048/2012PhotoContest_Old.pdf" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2012/04/13/9403048/2012PhotoContest_Old.pdf?referer=');">contest information details</a> (pdf))</p>
<p>ThinkGeoEnergy also maintains a geothermal picture collection at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/thinkgeoenergy" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.flickr.com/thinkgeoenergy?referer=');">www.flickr.com/thinkgeoenergy</a> with all pictures being provided free of charge under a creative commons license. People can also share geothermal pictures via the Flickr Group of ThinkGeoEnergy at: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/thinkgeoenergy/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.flickr.com/groups/thinkgeoenergy/?referer=');">www.flickr.com/groups/thinkgeoenergy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10887/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Hellisheidi_power_plant_2-300x225.jpg" length="16889" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota testing ORC systems at oilfields</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10792</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10792#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstration project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. state of North Dakota has favourable locations for EGS development and two current research projects are planning two demonstration sites to test ORC systems at oilfields. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) considers there to be favourable locations for deep enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in North Dakota, U.S.</p>
<p>In 2010 the University of North Dakota (UND) received two grants worth $1.7 million to install ORC systems at oilfields. The research project has plans to establish two demonstration sites of geothermal energy production this year at a  location near Rhame and one near Dickinson, North Dakota. The project is led by the <a href="http://www.und.nodak.edu/org/preec/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.und.nodak.edu/org/preec/?referer=');">Petroleum Research, Engineering, Education and Entrepreneurship Center</a> of UND</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-10795" title="Geothermal_Resource_US2009_NREL" src="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Geothermal_Resource_US2009_NREL1-1024x791.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="347" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://energynd.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/north-dakota-energy-spotlight-geothermal-generation/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/energynd.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/north-dakota-energy-spotlight-geothermal-generation/?referer=');">Energy North Dakota</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10792/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Badlands_NorthDakota-300x225.jpg" length="17771" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geothermal research a key element for further industry growth in Nevada</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10719</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10719#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Nevada Reno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy Calvin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geothermal energy research is poised to be an important economic driver in the state of Nevada and important for further growth of the geothermal power market in the state.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent article and republished here from the Reno Gazette Journal, Wendy Calvin, Professor for Geophysics &amp; Remote Sensing and Director of the Center for Geothermal Energy at University of Nevada-Reno, talks about how research is crucial to industry growth in the state of Nevada.</p>
<p>For now nearly 30 years, the state of Nevada has generated power from geothermal energy and there are now 22 geothermal power plants operating in Nevada. They have a combined power generation capacity of 469 MW. &#8220;Estimated resource potential in the state is more than 2,000 megawatts, or twice the production of the hydroelectric plant at the Hoover Dam.</p>
<p>Nevada also leads the nation in the number of geothermal projects in development.</p>
<p>With geothermal research poised to be an important economic driver in the state, industry collaboration with higher education has become even more important, as stated in the governor’s new economic development plan. Geothermal energy development was identified as one of seven industries that can be advanced by such collaboration.</p>
<p>The University of Nevada, Reno is at the forefront of these initiatives in Nevada and across the country. University faculty and staff have been involved in the exploration for and discovery of new geothermal systems for more than a decade. Faculty involved in geothermal energy research span many departments in the College of Science and College of Engineering, with strong expertise in geology, geochemistry and geophysical methods to identify new systems.</p>
<p>Projects at the university, many funded by the Department of Energy, seek to identify favorable structural settings and occurrence models for geothermal systems, create comprehensive geothermal potential maps and help locate undiscovered or “hidden” resources. Our studies on fault controls, shallow temperature anomalies, remote sensing of geothermal indicators and water chemistry from springs has resulted in the discovery of more than 14 previously unknown geothermal systems in Nevada.</p>
<p><strong>Why is Nevada in hot water?</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Internationally, most geothermal systems are sited near existing volcanoes, where high heat flow is associated with molten rock near the surface. In northwestern Nevada and the surrounding Great Basin states, the Earth’s crust is extending at high rates, due in part to the influence of plate boundary motion associated with the San Andreas Fault system. Higher rates of extension generate higher heat flow and allow fluid flow along fault structures.</p>
<p>A geothermal power plant requires both high temperature and sufficient fluid flow to create electricity. Most commonly, hot water is brought up from a few kilometers underground and converted to steam, which is used to turn a turbine. The geothermal fluid is then re-injected into the ground, completing the loop.</p>
<p><strong>Drill, baby, drill</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>While surface exploration can find the suggestion of a high heat flow, high-fluid-flow systems below ground, current geophysical methods and geological models only imperfectly “see” underground.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the only way to know if the system has sufficient heat and water to create an economically viable resource is to drill and test both the temperature and flow rate.</p>
<p>The high cost of deep drilling and historically low success rates (holes can either be too cold or dry) is one of the main factors limiting development of this sustainable, clean energy resource. Many have likened our system models for geothermal energy to where the oil and gas industries were in the 1950s. Ongoing activities at UNR can help identify drilling targets at numerous sites within the state and better understand known resources, helping to reduce the cost of exploration that the industry faces, as well as to maximize the odds for drilling in a productive location.</p>
<p><strong>Geothermal academy</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>The university has been a leader in education as well, hosting the National Geothermal Academy, a consortium of top geothermal universities around the country, last summer. The consortium selected our university because of its proximity to drilling sites, power plants and heat sources, as well as for its leadership in multidisciplinary research that has led to discovering new technologies for exploration, production and development of geothermal resources.</p>
<p>The academy, entering in its second year, will educate and train the next generation of scientists, engineers and policymakers. Curriculum is designed to cover all aspects of geothermal energy development and utilization and is offered for either undergraduate or graduate credit, as well as professional development for the energy industry.</p>
<p>For more information, contact the Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy at geothermal@unr.edu or visit <a href="http://www.unr.edu/geothermal" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.unr.edu/geothermal?referer=');">http://www.unr.edu/geothermal</a>.</p>
<p>Wendy Calvin is director of the Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy at the University of Nevada, Reno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10719/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/UniversityNevada_Reno-300x200.jpg" length="19297" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newberry EGS project in Oregon receives BLM approval</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10703</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10703#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AltaRock Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davenport Newberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newberry EGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newberry EGS, a joint venture of Davenport Newberry and AltaRock Energy, receives formal environmental approval by BLM and DOE and now can move on with development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release, Newberry EGS, a joint venture of Davenport Newberry and AltaRock Energy, announced that the Newberry Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Demonstration project has undergone a formal Environmental Assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Department of Energy have reached a <a href="http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/prineville/plans/newberryegs/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.blm.gov/or/districts/prineville/plans/newberryegs/?referer=');">Finding of No Significant Impact</a> (FONSI) . This milestone signifies that the Newberry Demonstration was subject to strict regulatory agency approval and has met the requirements of NEPA. Obtaining the FONSI decision was a necessary step for proceeding with Phase II of the project.</p>
<p>Located in the Deschutes National Forest in central Oregon, the purpose of the Newberry EGS project is to demonstrate AltaRock’s new technology designed to lower the cost of EGS, and thus allow economic extraction of heat from the earth in locations where high temperatures can be reached by conventional drilling techniques. Successful completion of the Demonstration will provide an exciting path forward to maximize the potential for geothermal energy development in the U.S. In issuing a FONSI, the regulatory agencies determined the project will not significantly affect the quality of the human or natural environment.</p>
<p>“Securing this authorization is a critical achievement for the Newberry EGS team having met national environmental policy and goals for the protection, maintenance and enhancement of the environment,” said Doug Perry, president and CEO of Davenport Newberry. “We are impressed with the BLM, Forest Service and Department of Energy’s efforts in conducting a comprehensive review and pleased with their ultimate approval. I am grateful to everyone who worked to reach this goal and look forward to implementing Phase II of the project.”</p>
<p>“Geothermal energy has the potential to meet a large share of our nation’s energy needs if we can demonstrate that we now have the technology to bring the price of EGS in line with existing utility rates,” said Susan Petty, president and founder of AltaRock Energy. “The Newberry EGS Demonstration will show that EGS can be an economically viable source of broad-scale 24/7 baseload renewable energy.”</p>
<p>The first phase of the Newberry EGS Project involving planning for the well stimulation, environmental studies and public outreach, recently reached completion. Key participants with AltaRock in the execution of Phase I included federal agencies (Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, and Dept. of Energy), state agencies (Oregon Depts. of Geology and Mineral Industries, Environmental Quality, and Water Resources), government scientific labs (US Geological Survey and Lawrence Berkeley, Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, and Sandia National Laboratories), universities (Oregon State, Temple, and Texas A&amp;M), and Davenport Newberry, the well and geothermal lease owner.</p>
<p>In Phase II of the Newberry EGS Demonstration, water will be injected into an existing hot well to create multiple reservoirs of connected cracks 6,500-11,000 feet below ground. Prior to the injection of water, an array of sensitive seismometers will be installed on the surface and in bore-holes for real-time monitoring of the EGS stimulation. Hydrologic monitoring will also be conducted during and after stimulation. Once the reservoirs are created, production wells will be drilled to intersect the stimulated fractures and flow tests will be conducted to evaluate the potential for using the EGS reservoirs as heat exchangers to produce electricity in the future. Phase II of the project is expected to be completed in 2014.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: Company release via <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/davenport-newberry-and-altarock-energy-receive-key-approval-for-the-newberry-enhanced-geothermal-systems-demonstration-project-2012-04-09" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/davenport-newberry-and-altarock-energy-receive-key-approval-for-the-newberry-enhanced-geothermal-systems-demonstration-project-2012-04-09?referer=');">Marketwatch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10703/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Newberry_project_drilling_rig-300x213.jpg" length="15280" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Geothermal secures $15 million loan facility for San Emidio North</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10695</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10695#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Regional Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Emidio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Emidio North]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Geothermal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Geothermal secures $15 million debt financing for its San Emidio North project in Nevada. The loan is provided by Geothermal Regional Center, a special vehicle helping investors to obtain permanent residence status in the U.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an announcement today, U.S. Geothermal Inc. announced &#8220;that it signed a Commitment Letter and Term Sheet with <a href="http://www.geothermalrc.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.geothermalrc.com/?referer=');">Geothermal Regional Center</a> (&#8220;GRC&#8221;) under which GRC will provide up to a $15 million loan facility for its San Emidio geothermal project.</p>
<p>The loan facility is expected to fund a portion of the development of the San Emidio North (Units 3 and 4) power project including the drilling of geothermal wells, related infrastructure and other development costs. GRC, the only USCIS approved Regional Center that is focused on the geothermal energy sector, plans to raise the capital through the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Pilot Program (the &#8220;EB-5 Program&#8221;). The EB-5 Program is designed for those foreign high net worth individuals who are interested in obtaining Permanent Residence status through investments in a commercial enterprise which are shown to have significant job creation benefits.</p>
<p>The San Emidio geothermal resource, located in Washoe County, Nevada, is divided into two separate sub-resources: San Emidio South under current development and San Emidio North under planned development. San Emidio South has been producing power since 1987, and a soon to be completed upgrade will triple the output of the project. San Emidio South is also developing Unit 2, a similar power plant module expected to produce 8.6 MW by Q4 2013. The San Emidio North project is planned to add 17.2 megawatts through construction of Units 3 and 4 subject to development of additional production wells, transmission access and a power sales agreement.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We are excited to support U.S. Geothermal, Inc. on this promising project and take a new step in growing our EB-5 Investor Program. We see great opportunities in the San Emidio Project and it is a win-win-win business for the geothermal energy industry in the U.S., our investors and the State of Nevada,&#8221; said Mr. Gonzalo Lopez Jordan, Managing Partner of Geothermal Regional Center.</p>
<p>The Geothermal Regional Center is supported by Glacier Securities that acts as project oversight consultant.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-geothermal-signs-commitment-letter-for-15-million-loan-facility-at-san-emidio-2012-04-11-9340?reflink=MW_news_stmp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/us-geothermal-signs-commitment-letter-for-15-million-loan-facility-at-san-emidio-2012-04-11-9340?reflink=MW_news_stmp&amp;referer=');">Release by U.S. Geothermal</a>, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/geothermal-regional-center-signs-commitment-letter-with-us-geothermal-inc-to-provide-up-to-us15-million-loan-facility-2012-04-11" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/geothermal-regional-center-signs-commitment-letter-with-us-geothermal-inc-to-provide-up-to-us15-million-loan-facility-2012-04-11?referer=');">Release by Geothermal Regional Center</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10695/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/SanEmidio_USGeothermal_Feb2012-300x167.png" length="85556" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg: Asia to see more than 50% of overall geothermal investment</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10598</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10598#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg New Energy Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg New Energy Finance sees Asia as the predominant geothermal market. Late-stage projects, good resources and increasing policy support will attract more than 50% of overall geothermal investments to go to Asia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent news piece on a recently released report on the U.S. geothermal energy market, Bloomberg New Energy Finance talks about the impact of a potential loss of federal subsidies on U.S. development and expected investment internationally.</p>
<p>As geothermal projects need longer to be developed they are less vulnerable to an expiration of production tax credits in the U.S. For the wind sector, where the tax credits run out at the end of this year, this means an immediate drop in the order of turbines and a loss in jobs. For geothermal, where tax credits are not expiring until the end of 2013, this won´t have that immediate effect.</p>
<p>On international investment into the geothermal market, Bloomberg New Energy Finance sees the Asian market attracting a majority of funds. Over 50 percent of investment into the geothermal sector will go to Asia due to &#8220;the number of late-stage projects, high-grade resources and increasing policy support.&#8221; It is also expected that Japan will see an increase in geothermal power capacity to up to 2,000 MW in the next 10-20 years.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-05/geothermal-projects-less-vulnerable-to-subsidy-cuts.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-05/geothermal-projects-less-vulnerable-to-subsidy-cuts.html?referer=');">Bloomberg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10598/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Darajat_geothermal_plant_Chevron_Indonesia-300x200.jpg" length="16071" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMU Geothermal Oil and Gas Development Working Group, April 18, 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10596</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10596#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Oil & Gas Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMU Geothermal Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SMU Geothermal Lab is hosting a Geothermal Oil &#038; Gas Development Working Group Meeting, April 18, 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SMU Geothermal Lab is hosting a working group meeting Wednesday, April 18th.</p>
<p>This event will bring together those focused on developing geothermal energy in oil/gas fields or related sedimentary basin projects.  The 2 hour afternoon networking session is designed to build stronger geothermal teams and to coincide with a luncheon lecture organized by the Maguire Energy Institute for the oil and gas industry.</p>
<p>The Frank Pitts Lecture, from noon to 1:30 pm, provides an additional networking opportunity for the geothermal industry to interact with over 100 oil and gas industry leaders.  After the luncheon, the geothermal participants will meet.  Several participants will kick us off with informal 5 minute highlights of what’s happening in the industry, followed by an open networking period for an exchange of your ideas towards developing geothermal ‘plays’, then finish off with the last 20 minutes to create the “next-step actions for geothermal success” list.  The Texas Legislative session begins in January 2013.  The list will be used for legislative items and to assist the SMU Geothermal Lab in our focus on geothermal development projects.</p>
<p>April 18, 2012,  2 to 4 pm, Hughes-Trigg Ballroom East, SMU Campus, Dallas</p>
<p>&#8211;&gt; <a href="http://smu.edu/geothermal/Oil&amp;Gas/registration/reg_network.asp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/smu.edu/geothermal/Oil_amp_Gas/registration/reg_network.asp?referer=');">Registration</a></p>
<p>Source: Announcement by e-mail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10596/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/SouthernMethodistUniversity_SMU-300x200.jpg" length="19883" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyrq Energy expects Lightning Dock to operate by 2013</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10579</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10579#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrq Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightning Dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cyrq Energy - formerly Raser Technologies - is moving its Lightning Dock project in New Mexico further, expecting it to be operational by the end of 2013.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyrq Energy (formerly Raser Technologies) is moving it Lightning Dock project further and expects to start construction this fall or next winter. The company will invest about $100 million in the plant.</p>
<p>The plant is then expected to be operational by the end of 2013, which seems a bit ambitious. The plant would be New Mexico&#8217;s first commercial geothermal power plant.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/print-edition/2012/03/30/geothermal-energy-project-grows-hotter.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/print-edition/2012/03/30/geothermal-energy-project-grows-hotter.html?referer=');">New Mexico Business Weekly</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10579/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/LightningDock_Raser_drilling-300x224.jpg" length="24361" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GEA releases US Geothermal Market Update April 2012</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10387</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10387#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual U.S. Geothermal Power Production and Development Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal Energy Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Geothermal Energy Association released its Annual U.S. Geothermal Power Production and Development Report today, highlighting slow but steady growth despite a challenging economy and inconsistent government policies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its Annual  &#8221;U.S. Geothermal Power Production and Development Report&#8221; released today, the U.S. Geothermal Energy Association provides an overview on current development in the United States.</p>
<p>The report highlights that 91 MW of geothermal power generation capacity were added to the grid in the U.S. last year.</p>
<p>&#8220;Currently, geothermal electric power generation is occurring in eight U.S. states, including Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Wyoming. An additional seven states—Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas and Washington—have geothermal capacity in development. California continues to lead the way when it comes to geothermal energy. The Golden State ranks first in overall installed capacity, with 2,615 MW already online, and it has nearly 2,000 MW of capacity in development. Nevada is also ahead of the pack, with 59 projects currently in development, more than any other state.</p>
<p>The implementation of binary geothermal technology has enabled the industry to develop lower temperature resources, which has expanded the geothermal industry’s geographical footprint beyond California, especially in the last decade. “Demonstrating the abilities of geothermal systems to produce power from lower temperature systems, such as oil and gas coproduced geothermal, is pushing out the boundaries for geothermal power to encompass over a third of the U.S.,” said GEA Executive Director Karl Gawell.</p>
<p>“We’ve seen slow but steady growth for geothermal, even in a challenging economy. The drivers for that growth have been state renewable portfolio standards, federal tax credits, DOE demonstration project support, and the fact that utility scale geothermal energy offers clean baseload energy that’s competitive with other clean energy technologies,” Gawell said. “The geothermal industry looks to our policy leaders to provide a stable environment to foster growth that could lead the U.S. toward greater energy independence.”</p>
<p>Gawell continued: “With federal tax credits expiring at the end of 2013, many new geothermal power plants cannot count on federal help. Most plants need between four and eight years of lead time before the geothermal resource is on tap. As Washington debates whether or not to extend renewable energy tax incentives, the industry struggles to continue steady growth. Stable tax credit policies would further enhance this development. State policies also continued to support new development, but need to better recognize the full value of geothermal, particularly its contribution to the reliability of the power system.”</p>
<p>In the past year, capacity was installed by four different geothermal companies. Energy Source completed its 49.9 MW Hudson Ranch I project in Imperial Valley, Calif. during the first quarter of 2012, while Ormat Technologies finished 26 MW worth of projects over the past year. Terra-Gen completed a 1.9 MW expansion project in Nevada, and U.S. Geothermal expanded electricity generation at its San Emidio resource that replaced old generating equipment at the site with a new 12.75 MW power plant.</p>
<p>“As the economy strengthens, our industry is expected to bring even more geothermal capacity online in the coming years,” Gawell said. “In 2012, another 100 MW of capacity is expected to come online representing nearly one billion dollars of investment in the clean energy economy.”</p>
<p>“The US geothermal industry continues to be actively engaged in a faster growing world market, which is helping many companies through the slack in the U.S.,” Gawell noted. According to the Department of Commerce, geothermal is one of only two renewables that exports more than it imports in the United States. Geothermal equipment manufacturers and service providers exist in almost every state and are able to provide jobs in states such as Georgia and Oklahoma and then export goods abroad.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report is available via <a href="http://geo-energy.org/reports.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/geo-energy.org/reports.aspx?referer=');">geo-energy.org</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.geo-energy.org/pressReleases/GEA2012_IndustryReport_release.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.geo-energy.org/pressReleases/GEA2012_IndustryReport_release.aspx?referer=');">GEA release</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10387/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GEA_USMarketUpdate2012-300x218.jpg" length="14954" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>OrCal Geothermal financial rating provides insight into operations</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10382</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10382#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heber 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heber 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OrCal Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ormat Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent financial rating report on Ormat Technology owned OrCal Energy, which operates the Heber 1 and 2 geothermal power plants in the Imperial Valley, California provides a good insight into the current operations and work done on the plants.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a release earlier this month, Fitch Ratings provided details on its rating on senior (debt) notes for OrCal Geothermal Inc.,  a special purpose company used by Ormat Technologies to acquire the Heber 1 and Heber 2 eothermal power plants in the Imperial Valley in California, a while back.</p>
<p>The release provides some interesting insight into the operation of both plants. Financial rating agencies are providing credit ratings and the reports highlight arguments for a particular rating of the financial vehicle, here the affirmation of the &#8220;BBB-&#8221; rating with a &#8220;stable&#8221; outlook.</p>
<p>According to the release there is extensive planned capital enhancements at Heber 1 planned by the company.</p>
<p>&#8220;Heber 1 has been showing typical geothermal fluid losses over the last few years that have reduced its production. OrCal is addressing the performance of Heber 1 by drilling new wells over the next 12-18 months with the expectation of  bringing on incremental production in the coming years, which Fitch views as supportive of the current rating. In  addition, OrCal is planning significant discretionary modernizations of the turbine and generator equipment as well as balance of plant upgrades that could benefit Heber 1 longer term.</p>
<p>The production enhancements at Heber 1 are expected to be paid through an existing subordinated loan agreement from OrCal.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;OrCal is negotiating with various parties to sign a new PPA to replace an SRAC-based PPA that expires in 2015 for 48% of the project&#8217;s total capacity. OrCal&#8217;s status as a qualifying facility and a base-load renewable generator puts its power in demand in California.</p>
<p>OrCal is a special-purpose company created to acquire the Heber 1 and Heber 2 geothermal power facilities (the Heber power plants) located in Imperial County, CA. The Heber power plants sell electric energy and capacity to SCE under two<br />
separate Standard Offer No. 4 PPAs expiring 2015 and 2023. OrCal also owns the Gould 1 and Gould 2 plants which consist of a series of upgrades designed to enhance production and operating efficiency at the Heber power plants. The Heber South power plant, which became operational in 2008, supplies energy to Southern California Public Power Authority under a separate fixed-price PPA.</p>
<p>OrCal is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Ormat Technologies, Inc.</p>
<p>Source: Fitch Ratings release via <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/16/idUSWNA277920120316" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/16/idUSWNA277920120316?referer=');">Reuters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10382/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Heber_plant_Ormat_California-300x230.jpg" length="23277" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geothermal experts brief US Congress on geothermal potential</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10194</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10194#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[briefing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Blackwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Faulds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Gawell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the honorary host, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, a geothermal briefing featured, Karl Gawell of GEA, David Blackwell of SMU and James Fauld of the University of Nevada-Reno. It highlighted the role geothermal energy could play and the vast potential of it in the U.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a Congressional Briefing this week, geothermal experts provided an overview on the opportunities for geothermal power generation in the United States.</p>
<p>The briefing was hosted by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, a long time supporter of geothermal energy in the U.S. The briefing featured Karl Gawell, Executive Director of the U.S. Geothermal Energy Association, David Blackwell, Professor of Geophysics at SMU and a foremost expert in geothermal mapping, as well as James Faulds, professor at the University of Nevada-Reno and director of the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology.</p>
<p>The briefing outlined the variety of techniques available for geothermal power production, accessibility of unconventional geothermal resources across the U.S. and the opportunities of a technology cross-over from the oil and gas industry.</p>
<p>The session has been on of a series of congressional briefings on &#8220;the science and technology to achieve the nation&#8217;s energy goals, titled collectively, &#8220;The Road to the New Energy Economy&#8221;.&#8221; It was organized by the National Science Foundation, Discover Magazine, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).</p>
<p>David Blackwell of SMU highlighted the research done by SMU on mapping the geothermal resources of the U.S.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-smu-expert-touts-nationwide-geothermal.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-smu-expert-touts-nationwide-geothermal.html?referer=');">PhysOrg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10194/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HouseofCongress_Washington_US-300x225.jpg" length="16646" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BLM approves Tungsten Mountain project by Ormat Technologies</title>
		<link>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10181</link>
		<comments>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lxrichter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ormat Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tungsten Mountain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkgeoenergy.com/?p=10181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Land Management in Nevada has approved the Tungsten Mountain Geothermal Exploration Project by Ormat Technologies, allowing the company to prepare drilling activities on the project site in Edwards Cree Valley, Churchill County, Nevada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported yesterday, The U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approved the Tungsten Mountain Geothermal Exploration Project proposed by Ormat Technologies Inc., in Edwards Creek Valley, Churchill County, approximately 60 miles east of Fallon, Nev.</p>
<p>The proposed geothermal exploration project consists of 610 acres of public lands within the lease area. The EA analyzes potential impacts from the proposed exploration and testing activities proposed by Ormat. The primary objective of the project is to further evaluate the characteristics of the geothermal resources in the Tungsten Mountain Project Area.</p>
<p>The proposed activities include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Constructing 27 exploration well drill pads</li>
<li>Construct and maintain a 5-acre mineral material pit</li>
<li>Constructing, improving or maintaining access roads</li>
<li>Drilling and completing an exploration well to a depth of about 7,000 feet from each of the constructed drill pads</li>
<li>Flow testing exploration wells to obtain samples of geothermal fluids and to collect aquifer information from the geothermal reservoir</li>
<li>Drilling temporary water wells at one or more proposed drill</li>
</ul>
<p>The documents may be reviewed online at <a href="www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/carson_city_field/blm_information/nepa.html" target="_blank">www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/carson_city_field/blm_information/nepa.html</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.mynews4.com/news/local/story/BLM-approves-Tungsten-Mountain-Geothermal/YFy5rbljF0ugrynW-rJK1A.cspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.mynews4.com/news/local/story/BLM-approves-Tungsten-Mountain-Geothermal/YFy5rbljF0ugrynW-rJK1A.cspx?referer=');">KRNV News 4, Reno, Nevada</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/10181/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url="http://thinkgeoenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/GrimesPoint_Fallon_ChurchillCounty_Nevada-300x225.jpg" length="21151" type="image/jpg" />	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

